bioRxivGeneticsPreprint
Physical activity reduces colorectal cancer risk independent of BMI - A two-sample Mendelian randomisation study
Xiaomeng ZhangiD, Evropi ΤheodoratouiD, Xue LiiD, Susan Mary FarringtoniD, Philip LawiD, Peter BroderickiD, Marion WalkeriD, Jessica M. B. ReesiD, Richard S. HoulstoniD, Ian P.M. TomlinsoniD, Harry Campbell, Malcolm G. DunlopiD, Maria N TimofeevaiD
Abstract
BackgroundEvidence from observational studies suggests a protective role for physical activity (PA) against colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. However, it has yet to be established a causal relationship. We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) study to examine causality between physical activity and CRC risk.\n\nMethodsWe used common genetic variants associated with self-reported and accelerometer-based physical activity as instrumental variables (IVs) in this MR study. The IVs were derived from the largest available genome-wide association study (GWAS) of physical activity, namely UK Biobank. We analysed the effect of the IVs for physical activity in a large CRC GWAS that included 31 197 cases and 61 770 controls. We applied inverse variance weighted (IVW) method as the main analysis method.\n\nResultsOur results demonstrate a protective effect between accelerometer-based physical activity and CRC risk (the outlier-adjusted ORIVW was 0.92 per one standard deviation (SD) increase of accelerometer-base physical activity [95% CI: 0.87-0.98, P: 0.01]). The effect between self-reported physical activity and CRC risk was not statistically significant but was also supportive of an inverse association (the outlier-adjusted ORIVW was 0.61 per 1 SD increase of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [95%CI: 0.36-1.06, P: 0.08]).\n\nConclusionsThe findings of this large MR study show for the first time that objectively measured physical activity is causally implicated in reducing CRC risk. The limitations of the study are that it is based on only two genetic instruments and that it has limited power, despite the study size. Nonetheless, at a population level, these findings provide strong reinforcing evidence to support public health policy measures that encourage exercise, even in obese individuals.
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Physical activity and risks of breast and colorectal cancer: A Mendelian randomization analysis
Nikos Papadimitriou, Niki L. Dimou, … Neil Murphy·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 30, 2020
- Physical activity and risk of lung cancer: a two-sample Mendelian randomiza-tion study
Sebastian Edgar Baumeister, Michael Fred Leitzmann, … Hansjörg Baurecht·bioRxiv·Apr 9, 2020
- Mendelian randomization suggests a bidirectional, causal relationship between physical inactivity and obesity
Germán D. Carrasquilla, Mario García-Ureña, … Tuomas O. Kilpeläinen·eLifePeer-reviewed·Mar 4, 2022
- Physical activity and risk of Alzheimer’s disease: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study
Sebastian Edgar Baumeister, André Karch, … Hansjörg Baurecht·NeurologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 17, 2020
- Testing Causal Bidirectional Influences between Physical Activity and Depression using Mendelian Randomization
Karmel W. Choi, Chia‐Yen Chen, … Jordan W. Smoller·JAMA PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Jan 24, 2019
- Intake of red and processed meat, use of non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, genetic variants and risk of colorectal cancer; a prospective study of the Danish \"Diet, Cancer and Health\" cohort
Vibeke Charlotte Andersen, Ulrich Halekoh, … Tine Iskov Kopp·International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewed·Mar 5, 2019