IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Critical nodes reveal peculiar features of human essential genes and protein interactome
Alessandro CelestiniiD, Marco CianfrigliaiD, Enrico MastrostefanoiD, Alessandro PalmaiD, Filippo CastiglioneiD, Paolo TieriiD
Abstract
Network-based ranking methods (e.g., centrality analysis) have found extensive use in systems biology and network medicine for the prediction of essential proteins, for the prioritization of drug targets candidates in the treatment of several pathologies and in biomarker discovery, and for human disease genes identification. We here studied the connectivity of the human protein-protein interaction network (i.e., the interactome) to find the nodes whose removal has the heaviest impact on the network, i.e., maximizes its fragmentation. Such nodes are known as Critical Nodes (CNs). Specifically, we implemented a Critical Node Heuristic (CNH) and compared its performance against other four heuristics based on well known centrality measures. To better understand the structure of the interactome, the CNs role played in the network, and the different heuristics capabilities to grasp biologically relevant nodes, we compared the sets of nodes identified as CNs by each heuristic with two experimentally validated sets of essential genes, i.e., the genes whose removal impact on a given organisms ability to survive. Our results show that classical centrality measures (i.e., closeness centrality, degree) found more essential genes with respect to CNH on the current version of the human interactome, however the removal of such nodes does not have the greatest impact on interactome connectivity, while, interestingly, the genes identified by CNH show peculiar characteristics both from the topological and the biological point of view. Finally, even if a relevant fraction of essential genes is found via the classical centrality measures, the same measures seem to fail in identifying the whole set of essential genes, suggesting once again that some of them are not central in the network, that there may be biases in the current interaction data, and that different, combined graph theoretical and other techniques should be applied for their discovery.
- organism: human
- assay: protein structure
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
- approach: graph neural network
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.70
- Field percentile
- top 18%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A systematic survey of centrality measures for protein-protein interaction networks
Minoo Ashtiani, Ali Salehzadeh‐Yazdi, … Mohieddin Jafari·BMC Systems BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 31, 2018
- Centrality and the shortest path approach on the human interactome
Natalia Rubanova, Nadya Morozova·Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 11, 2019
- Link clustering explains non-central essential genes in protein interaction networks
Inhae Kim, Heetak Lee, … Sanguk Kim·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Aug 12, 2019
- Comparative analysis of Pure Hubs and Pure Bottlenecks in Human Protein-protein Interaction Networks
Chandramohan Nithya, Manjari Kiran, Hampapathalu Adimurthy Nagarajaram·bioRxiv·Apr 6, 2021
- IHS: an integrative method for the identification of network hubs
Adrian Salavaty, Mirana Ramialison, Peter David Currie·PatternsPeer-reviewed·Jun 22, 2020
- CINNA: An R/CRAN package to decipher Central Informa-tive Nodes in Network Analysis
Minoo Ashtiani, Mehdi Mirzaie, Mohieddin Jafari·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 18, 2018