Decoding Speech and Music Stimuli from the Frequency Following Response
Steven D. LosorelliiD, Blair KaneshiroiD, Gabriella MusacchiaiD, Nikolas H. BlevinsiD, Matthew B. FitzgeraldiD
Abstract
The ability to differentiate complex sounds is essential for communication. Here, we propose using a machine-learning approach, called classification, to objectively evaluate auditory perception. In this study, we recorded frequency following responses (FFRs) from 13 normal-hearing adult participants to six short music and speech stimuli sharing similar fundamental frequencies but varying in overall spectral and temporal characteristics. Each participant completed a perceptual identification test using the same stimuli. We used linear discriminant analysis to classify FFRs. Results showed statistically significant FFR classification accuracies using both the full response epoch in the time domain (72.3% accuracy, p < 0.001) as well as real and imaginary Fourier coefficients up to 1 kHz (74.6%, p < 0.001). We classified decomposed versions of the responses in order to examine which response features contributed to successful decoding. Classifier accuracies using Fourier magnitude and phase alone in the same frequency range were lower but still significant (58.2% and 41.3% respectively, p < 0.001). Classification of overlapping 20-msec subsets of the FFR in the time domain similarly produced reduced but significant accuracies (42.3%-62.8%, p < 0.001). Participants mean perceptual responses were most accurate (90.6%, p < 0.001). Confusion matrices from FFR classifications and perceptual responses were converted to distance matrices and visualized as dendrograms. FFR classifications and perceptual responses demonstrate similar patterns of confusion across the stimuli. Our results demonstrate that classification can differentiate auditory stimuli from FFR responses with high accuracy. Moreover, the reduced accuracies obtained when the FFR is decomposed in the time and frequency domains suggest that different response features contribute complementary information, similar to how the human auditory system is thought to rely on both timing and frequency information to accurately process sound. Taken together, these results suggest that FFR classification is a promising approach for objective assessment of auditory perception.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Auditory cortical coding of spectrotemporal modulations is sufficient to support perceptual categorization of speech and music
Jérémie Ginzburg, Clarisse Gotti, … Philippe Albouy·bioRxiv·Jun 5, 2025
- Behavioral and neural sound classification: Insights from natural and synthetic sounds
Mattson Ogg·bioRxiv·Jan 6, 2025
- A robust voice-selective response in the human brain as revealed by electrophysiological recordings and fast periodic auditory stimulation
Francesca M. Barbero, Roberta P. Calce, … Olivier Collignon·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2021
- EEG-based classification of natural sounds reveals specialized responses to speech and music
Nathaniel J Zuk, E. S. Teoh, E. C. Lalor·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jan 18, 2020
- Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception
Gavin M. Bidelman, Sara Momtaz·Neuroscience LettersPeer-reviewed·Jan 23, 2021
- Linear superposition of responses evoked by individual glottal pulses explain over 80% of the frequency following response to human speech in the macaque monkey
Tobias Teichert, G. Nike Gnanateja, … Bharath Chandrasekaran·bioRxiv·Sep 6, 2021