bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Full-length COI barcodes improve eDNA metabarcoding data denoising relative to mini-barcodes
Marius Hannes EiseleiD, Sirle VaruskiD, Kaarel SammetiD, Ali HakimzadehiD, Martin MetsojaiD, Leho TedersooiD, Khairiah Mubarak AlwutaydiD, Paula ArribasiD, Carmelo AndújariD, Brent C. EmersoniD, Sten AnslaniD
Abstract
Animal COI (mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I) metabarcoding of environmental DNA (eDNA) is increasingly used to assess biodiversity in complex substrates such as soil. However, due to read-length constraints of second-generation sequencing platforms, mini-barcodes have been used instead of the full barcode region. Long-read sequencing technologies now enable the recovery of full-length barcode sequences, and are more commonly applied for studying microbes, but their use for metabarcoding the full-length standard COI barcoding region in animals remains limited. In this study, we compared three COI amplicon sets - 313 bp, 660 bp, and 1,256 bp - amplified from soil eDNA samples and sequenced using Illumina and PacBio platforms to evaluate their overall concurrence, the effectiveness of identifying nuclear mitochondrial DNA segments (NUMTs) and chimeras, as well as their respective taxonomic resolution. The long-read datasets exhibited a higher identification rate of NUMTs and true chimeras, suggesting that longer sequences improve the detection of noise in COI metabarcoding data, thereby reducing the occurrence of spurious taxa. Taxonomy assignment confidence was similar between the 313 bp and 660 bp datasets, whereas extending the amplicon beyond the standard COI barcode region (1,256 bp) reduced confidence, likely because longer reads extend into regions poorly represented in barcode reference databases. Despite substantially lower sequencing depth in the 660 bp dataset, per-sample OTU richness did not differ significantly from that recovered with the Illumina 313 bp amplicon set. Similarly, the relationships between samples were strongly correlated across the detected OTU communities, indicating consistent ecological interpretations between short and long amplicons. We conclude that the standard [~]658 bp COI barcode is an optimal marker for soil animal metabarcoding from eDNA, balancing target recovery, artifact detection, taxonomic assignment and ecological interpretability. As COI eDNA metabarcoding becomes increasingly used in biodiversity assessment and is increasingly adopted in large-scale monitoring initiatives, this study provides methodological guidance for improving the robustness of soil animal community biomonitoring.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Bacteria are everywhere, even in your COI marker gene data!
Haris Zafeiropoulos, Laura M. Gargan, … Jens Carlsson·Metabarcoding and MetagenomicsPeer-reviewed·Nov 3, 2021
- The bacterial hitchhiker's guide to COI: Universal primer-based COI capture probes fail to exclude bacterial DNA, but 16S capture leaves metazoa behind
Sanni Hintikka, Jeanette E. L. Carlsson, Jens Carlsson·Metabarcoding and MetagenomicsPeer-reviewed·May 31, 2022
- The Metabarcoding Analysis Pipeline (MAP): Simple, accurate, and flexible metabarcoding
Sean W. J. Prosser, Nicholas W. Bard, … Paul D. N. Hebert·bioRxiv·Aug 31, 2026
- Over 2.5 million COI sequences in GenBank and growing
T. M. Porter, M. Hajibabaei·bioRxiv·Jun 22, 2018
- Long-range PCR amplification and nanopore sequencing of 8-10 kb mitochondrial fragments from environmental DNA
Stephanie A. Matthews, Olivia M. Scott, … Ryan P. Kelly·bioRxiv·Jan 14, 2026
- Benchmarking full-length ITS metabarcoding across Illumina 2x500, PacBio, and Oxford Nanopore sequencing using mock and soil communities
Leho Tedersoo, Marko Prous, … Vladimir S. Mikryukov·bioRxiv·May 21, 2026