bioRxivImmunologyPreprint
Using the modified male osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Taiwan to predict osteoporosis onset - a sub-study of the Taiwan osteoporosis survey
Y.-C. Chen, D.-H. Liu, T.-T. Cheng, J.-F. Chen, S.-F. Yu, W.-C. Chiu, C.-Y. Hsu
Abstract
PurposeTo develop a risk index by item reduction from multiple variable regression, which can identify male Taiwanese patients at risk of developing osteoporosis.\n\nMethodsTo develop the model, a risk index was identified by item reduction from multivariate regression analysis. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and their sensitivity/specificity, MOSTAi was validated in a separate cohort of Taiwanese men and its performance with compared with the National Osteoporosis Foundation recommendations (NOF 2013).\n\nResultsBetween 2008 and 2011 a total of 4,323 males were enrolled for bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. Univariate analysis identified four major risk factors for osteoporosis, including age, body weight (BW), previous fracture and body height. The ROC analysis showed the area under the curve (AUC) for the model based on the three-variable, two-variable (age and BW), and one-variable models (BW), was 0.701 (p<0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.658-0.744), 0.700 (p<0.001, 95% CI, 0.656-0.742), and 0.690 (p<0.001, 95% CI, 0.646-0.734), respectively. Using the optimal cutoff value (-2) for the OSTA, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) in the validation cohort were 64.0%, 65.7%, 26.9% and 90.2%, respectively. The ROC curves for predicting osteoporosis by MOSTAi, OSTA and NOF 2013 and the AUC for MOSTAi, OSTA and NOF 2013 was 0.706 (p<0.001, 95% CI: 0.664-0.748) and 0.697(p<0.001, 95% CI: 0.657-0.738), respectively.\n\nConclusionThe results showed that MOSTAi could be a more precise model than OSTA and NOF 2013, for identifying men in Taiwan with osteoporosis who require referrals for DXA scans. It was demonstrated that MOSTAi is a simple tool with fair sensitivity/specificity and PPV, and high NPV. MOSTAi could also be a more accurate model than OSTA for identifying men in Taiwan at risk of osteoporosis. In comparison with NOF 2013, MOSTAi is a more accurate and simpler tool for the referral of Taiwanese men for DXA scans.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Osteoporosis Genetic Risk Prediction Using Bone Mineral Density Polygenic Scores in Japanese: TMM CommCohort Study
Yayoi Otsuka‐Yamasaki, Yoichi Sutoh, … Atsushi Shimizu·Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 9, 2026
- Using multivariable Mendelian randomization to estimate the causal effect of bone mineral density on osteoarthritis risk, independent of body mass index
April E. Hartley, Eleanor C. M. Sanderson, … Jonathan H. Tobias·International Journal of EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 15, 2021
- Proteome-wide Mendelian randomization implicates TIMP2 as a putative causal protein for bone mineral density and fracture risk
Chen‐Yang Su, Maya Akerman, … Satoshi Yoshiji·medRxiv·Mar 16, 2026
- Improved prediction of femoral fracture toughness in mice by combining standard medical imaging with Raman spectroscopy
C. Massie, E. Knapp, … H. A. Awad·bioRxiv·Nov 20, 2020
- Vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene FokI, BsmI, ApaI and TaqI polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: a meta-analysis
Upendra Yadav, Pradeep Kumar, Vandana Rai·Egyptian Journal of Medical Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 12, 2020
- A biomechanical investigation of stair descent in postmenopausal women: A regression analysis considering walking speed and T-score
Ali Dostanpor, Catherine A. Dobson, Natalie Vanicek·bioRxiv·Aug 7, 2025