Response of neuronal populations to phase-locked stimulation: model-based predictions and validation
Nima MirkhaniiD, Colin G. McNamaraiD, Gaspard OliviersiD, Andrew SharottiD, Benoit DuchetiD, Rafał BogacziD
Abstract
BackgroundModulation of neuronal oscillations holds promise for the treatment of neurological disorders. Nonetheless, stimulating neuronal populations in a continuous open-loop manner can lead to side effects and suboptimal efficiency. Closed-loop strategies such as phase-locked stimulation aim to address these shortcomings by offering a more targeted modulation. While theories have been developed to understand the neural response to stimulation, their predictions have not been thoroughly tested using experimental data. ObjectiveWe aimed to test the predictions of a mathematical model regarding the response of neuronal populations to phase-locked stimulation. MethodsUsing a coupled oscillator model, we expanded on two key predictions describing the response to stimulation as a function of the phase and amplitude of ongoing neural activity. To investigate these predictions, we analyzed electrocorticogram (ECoG) recordings from a previously conducted study in Parkinsonian rats, and extracted the corresponding phase and response curves. ResultsWe demonstrated that the amplitude response to stimulation is strongly correlated to the derivative of the phase response ({rho} > 0.8) in all animals except one, thereby validating a key model prediction. The second prediction postulated that the stimulation becomes ineffective when the network synchrony is high, a trend that appeared missing in the data. Our analysis explained this discrepancy by showing that the neural populations in Parkinsonian rats did not reach the level of synchrony for which the theory would predict ineffective stimulation. ConclusionsOur results highlight the potential of fine-tuning stimulation paradigms informed by mathematical models that consider both the ongoing phase and amplitude of the targeted neural oscillation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Field percentile
- top 27%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Phase-dependent closed-loop modulation of neural oscillations in vivo
Colin G. McNamara, Max Rothwell, Andrew Sharott·bioRxiv·May 21, 2020
- Predicting the effects of deep brain stimulation using a reduced coupled oscillator model
Gihan Weerasinghe, Benoit Duchet, … Rafał Bogacz·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 8, 2019
- Modulation of motor cortical theta and gamma oscillations using phase-targeted, closed-loop optogenetic stimulation of local excitatory and inhibitory neurons
Jessica Myatt, Robert A. Toth, … Andrew Sharott·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Jan 23, 2026
- Phase-targeted Poisson closed-loop peripheral nerve stimulation modulates sensorimotor oscillations in human MEG
Stuart N. Baker, Boubker Zaaimi·bioRxiv·Oct 8, 2026
- How to design optimal brain stimulation to modulate phase-amplitude coupling?
Benoit Duchet, Rafał Bogacz·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Jul 10, 2024
- Phase-dependent suppression of beta oscillations in Parkinson’s disease patients
Abbey B. Holt, Eszter Kormann, … Andrew Sharott·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 14, 2018