Plant pathogenic Ralstonia share two core methyl-accepting chemoreceptors that drive chemotaxis toward distinct amino acid profiles
Jason K. AvalosiD, Vienna N. ElmgreeniD, Christina R. GuerreroiD, Kimberly J. GrullaiD, Kasey MiqueoiD, Rebecca E. Parales, Tiffany M. Lowe‐PoweriD, Rebecca A. SchomeriD
Abstract
Ralstonia solanacearum species complex pathogens cause bacterial wilt disease in diverse plant families. These pathogens use chemotaxis and motility to discover host roots. The specificity of this process is conferred by methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs). We explored pangenomic variation of MCPs and other chemotaxis machinery across Ralstonia wilt pathogens. We classified 19 MCPs as broadly conserved, core MCPs, and we identified several accessory MCPs. Within their periplasmic sensing domains, two of the core MCPs contain a motif that is known to bind amino acid ligands: McpA1 and McpA2. To identify the ligands of McpA1 and McpA2, we constructed HyChemosensor strains. In HyChemosensor strains, the periplasmic sensing domains of the MCPs were translationally fused to the signaling domain of a model two component sensor, NarQ. The HyChemosensor assays revealed that the receptors, McpA1 and McpA2, have overlapping binding profiles for acidic amino acids. Nevertheless, McpA2 recognized a broader profile of amino acids. Quantitative swim plate assays confirmed that these receptors facilitate Ralstonias chemoattraction to amino acids. Consistent with prior evidence in a different Ralstonia strain background, mcpA1 was dispensable for virulence on tomato. However, single or double mutants lacking mcpA2 demonstrated reduced virulence on tomato following naturalistic soil soak inoculations. Thus, McpA1 and McpA2 have distinct roles in plant colonization, despite redundancy in their chemical specificity.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Attractant and repellent induce opposing changes in the chemoreceptor four-helix bundle ligand-binding domain
L. Guo, Y.-H. Wang, … D.-F. Li·bioRxiv·Mar 29, 2023
- Characterization of opposing responses to phenol by Bacillus subtilis chemoreceptors
G. A. Bodhankar, P. Tohidifar, … C. Rao·bioRxiv·Aug 31, 2021
- Phosphorylated CheV interacts with a subset of chemoreceptors
Miguel A. Matilla, Mario Cano‐Muñoz, … Tino Krell·bioRxiv·Feb 6, 2025
- Systematic mapping of chemoreceptor specificities for Pseudomonas aeruginosa
W. Xu, J. P. Cerna-Vargas, … V. Sourjik·bioRxiv·Apr 4, 2023
- Differential CheR affinity for chemoreceptor C-terminal pentapeptides biases chemotactic responses
Félix Velando, Elizabet Monteagudo‐Cascales, … Tino Krell·Molecular MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 23, 2024
- Heterologous Expression of Pseudomonas putida Methyl-Accepting Chemotaxis Proteins Yields Escherichia coli Chemotactic to Aromatic Compounds
C. Roggo, E. E. Clerc, … J. R. van der Meer·bioRxiv·Jun 5, 2018