henhao
Sign in
Animal Behavior & CognitionOxford Open Neuroscience
Peer-reviewed journal article

Sex differences in task engagement and lapse rate during reward learning

Claudia G. Aguirre, Jae Hyung WooiD, Lana Alhabbal, Taylor Fujioka, Romi Moore, Tony YeiD, Jaime J. CastrelloniD, Alireza SoltaniiD, Alicia IzquierdoiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Our understanding of sex differences in reward learning has been limited due to the predominant study of males. Here, we evaluated sex differences in flexible learning in two domains: the learning of stimulus-and action-based associations and their reversals. During action-based learning, rats selected between two identical visual stimuli presented on a touchscreen, where the spatial location predicted a higher probability of reward. For stimulus-based learning, rats chose between two distinct visual stimuli presented in pseudorandom spatial locations, one of which was associated with a higher probability of reward. Reversal phases involved switching reward contingency between the two actions or stimuli. We found that females did not differ in their discrimination or reversal learning accuracy compared to males, yet they collected fewer rewards and were more likely to omit trials than males in both domains. To gain a detailed understanding of differences across conditions, we modeled animals trial-by-trial choices using reinforcement learning (RL) models and examined their steady-state behavior to capture transitions between distinct behavioral states. Although the estimated parameters of the best-fitting RL model revealed some sex differences, the model that incorporated transitions between different behavioral states provided a better overall fit to the data. This model also revealed that across all reversal phases, females exhibited a higher transition-specific lapse rate than males, indicating greater task disengagement once there was no need for further learning. Together, our fine-grained analysis of behavior adds to a growing literature on sex differences in flexible reward learning.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISTara '19Harris '20Schuler '25Peterson '24Chen '20Chen '20
78% semantic matchAnimal Behavior & Cognition
C. G. Tara, K. G. Wallin-Miller, A. A. Rear+4 more·bioRxiv·Mar 18, 2019