Extraocular Electrical Stimulation Activates Retinal Ganglion Cells In Vivo
Nicholas Householder, Omid SharafiiD, Anahit Simonyan, Steven T. WalstoniD, Gianluca LazziiD, Michael S. BienkowskiiD, Kimberly Kinga GokoffskiiD
Abstract
Objective: Here, we directly demonstrate that extraocular electrical stimulation can reliably activate retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in vivo and systematically identify optimal stimulation waveforms that maximize RGC activation at tolerable amplitudes. Approach: Using transpupillary two-photon calcium imaging in Thy1-GCaMP6f rats, we directly visualized RGC activation during extraocular electrical stimulation with single-cell resolution. We tested symmetric (SCB 1:1) and asymmetric (ACB 1:4) charge-balanced waveforms across frequencies ranging from 20 to 5,000 Hz and amplitudes from 1 to 300 uA, correlating cellular calcium responses with behavioral outcomes during awake stimulation. Main Results: ACB 1:4 stimulation at lower frequencies (20-50 Hz) robustly and reliably activates RGC somas in vivo, producing larger calcium responses at lower amplitudes than SCB 1:1. At comparable amplitudes, ACB stimulation generated 1.8-fold greater calcium responses. In contrast, SCB stimulation required higher amplitudes that exceeded animal tolerance before reliable RGC activation could be achieved. Significance: These findings provide direct evidence that extraocular electrodes can reliably activate RGCs in vivo. Notably, stimulation parameters previously associated with full-length optic nerve regeneration were found to be minimally effective at activating RGCs in vivo, suggesting increased gains could be had with newer approaches. The results further demonstrate that waveform asymmetry improves the efficiency of optic nerve stimulation by engaging RGC somas at lower, more tolerable, amplitudes. By combining two-photon imaging with behavioral tolerance testing, this work defines a practical therapeutic window for extraocular stimulation of the eye and establishes asymmetric charge-balanced waveforms as a more clinically translatable strategy for visual pathway neuromodulation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Population-Scale Analysis of Frequency-Dependent Calcium Dynamics in Retinal Ganglion Cells Under Electric Field Stimulation
Omid Sharafi, Timothy Silliman, … Gianluca Lazzi·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Apr 24, 2026
- Focal Electrical Stimulation of Human Retinal Ganglion Cells for Vision Restoration
Sasidhar S. Madugula, Alex R. Gogliettino, … E. J. Chichilnisky·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Nov 24, 2022
- Epiretinal stimulation with local returns enhances selectivity at cellular resolution
Victoria H. Fan, Lauren E. Grosberg, … E. J. Chichilnisky·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Nov 7, 2018
- Photovoltaic stimulation efficiently evokes network-mediated activity of retinal ganglion cells
Naïg Aurélia Ludmilla Chenais, Marta Jole Ildelfonsa Airaghi Leccardi, Diego Ghezzi·bioRxiv·Jun 7, 2019
- Inference of Electrical Stimulation Sensitivity from Recorded Activity of Primate Retinal Ganglion Cells
Sasidhar S. Madugula, Ramandeep S. Vilkhu, … E. J. Chichilnisky·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 2, 2023
- Spatially Patterned Bi-electrode Epiretinal Stimulation for Axon Avoidance at Cellular Resolution
R. S. Vilkhu, S. S. Madugula, … E. J. Chichilnisky·bioRxiv·Aug 17, 2021