Sign in
Genetic & Genomic MedicinemedRxiv
Preprint

Biallelic CYB5A disruptions in 46,XY Disorder of Sex Development: Identification and Characterization of a Novel Deep Intronic Variant

Shirin MoradifardiD, Thanh Nha Uyen LeiD, Nguyễn Thu HàiD, Vũ Chí Dũng, Bùi Phương Thảo, Vincent R. HarleyiD

Abstract

BackgroundThe diagnostic yield for 46,XY disorders of sex development (DSD) remains limited. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) improves detection of both coding and non-coding variants that may be missed by routine testing. Cytochrome b5, encoded by CYB5A, is an essential co-factor for CYP17A1-mediated 17,20-lyase activity. We report on WGS on a Vietnamese family with 46,XY DSD with two siblings presenting with female external genitalia. MethodsClinical assessment and hormone profiling were conducted. WGS was conducted on peripheral blood DNA, in two affected siblings followed by variant annotation and ACMG-based classification. A minigene RNA splicing assay in HEK293 cells was used to evaluate the functional impact of the CYB5A intronic variant. ResultsThe patients hormone profile showed low testosterone and estradiol. WGS identified compound-heterozygous CYB5A variants: a paternally inherited missense variant (p.Val34Glu, likely pathogenic) and a maternally inherited deep intronic deletion (c.129+862_129+863del) for which SpliceAI predicted aberrant splicing. Minigene assays confirmed that the intronic deletion creates cryptic splice sites, resulting in pseudoexon inclusion and a premature stop codon, consistent with nonsense-mediated decay. The intronic variant meets ACMG criteria for pathogenicity. ConclusionThis family expands the spectrum of CYB5A-related DSD and demonstrates that compound-heterozygous variants, including deep intronic defects, can lead to a disruption in 17,20-lyase activity. These findings highlight the importance of WGS and functional assays for identifying clinically relevant non-coding variants in DSD.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISBraga '19Bieder '20Silva '18Vaiani '21Eliyahu '26Sanchis‐Jua '18
57% semantic matchGenetics