Sign in
BioinformaticsComputational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Peer-reviewed journal article

Reverse Engineering DNA Origami Nanostructure Designs from Raw Scaffold and Staple Sequence Lists

Ben Shirt‐EdissiD, Jordan ConnollyiD, Juan ElezgarayiD, Emanuela TorelliiD, Silvia Adriana NavarroiD, Jaume BacarditiD, Natalio KrasnogoriD

Abstract

Designs for scaffolded DNA origami nanostructures are commonly and minimally published as the list of DNA staple and scaffold sequences required. In nearly all cases, high-level editable design files (e.g. caDNAno) which generated the low-level sequences are not made available. This de facto raw sequence exchange format allows published origami designs to be re-attempted in the laboratory by other groups, but effectively stops designs from being significantly modified or re-purposed for new future applications. To make the raw sequence exchange format more accessible to further design and engineering, in this work we propose the first algorithmic solution to the inverse problem of converting staple/scaffold sequences back to a guide schematic resembling the original origami schematic. The guide schematic can be used to aid the manual re-input of an origami into a CAD tool like caDNAno, hence recovering a high-level editable design file. Creation of a guide schematic can also be used to double check that a list of staple strand sequences does not have errors and indeed does assemble into a desired origami nanostructure prior to costly laboratory experimentation. We tested our reverse algorithm on 36 diverse origami designs from the literature and found that 29 origamis (81%) had a good quality guide schematic recovered from raw sequences. Our software is made available at https://revnano.readthedocs.io.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISJun '20Shirt‐Ediss '25Neuhoff '24Aksel '24Zerankeshi '25Ruiz '26
67% semantic matchBiophysics
H. Jun, X. Wang, W. Bricker+2 more·bioRxiv·Feb 9, 2020