Are veterinary clinical manuscripts published more slowly than medical or scientific counterparts? A comparative observational study
Abstract
BACKGROUNDPublication speeds of clinically relevant veterinary journals have not been evaluated.\n\nMETHODSWe compared 23 prominent veterinary journals to 11 comparable medical and 4 high-impact science journals and examined select factors that might affect these speeds. Submission date, acceptance date and first online publication date were recorded for 50 sequentially identified research articles from each journal that had been published immediately prior to April 26, 2018. Intervals from submission to acceptance, acceptance to publication, and submission to publication were calculated in days for each article. Data were compared visually across all journals, and statistically by field (veterinary, medical, high-impact), by impact factor and by publisher (commercial vs society) to identify trends or differences in publication intervals.\n\nRESULTSWhen assessed by field, intervals from submission to acceptance (p=0.18), acceptance to publication (p=0.75) and submission to publication (p=0.13) did not differ. Individual journals varied slightly in intervals from submission to acceptance, but varied markedly in intervals from acceptance to publication. Three journals had median intervals from acceptance to publication exceeding 135 days and two exceeding 500 days. Three journals had median intervals from submission to publication exceeding 550 days. Neither impact factor nor publication model affected any intervals. Intervals from submission to acceptance and acceptance to publication were positively associated with overall interval from submission to publication (rho=0.7, P<0.0001 for both associations).\n\nCONCLUSIONSIntervals from submission to acceptance for veterinary journals are like those for medical and high-impact journals, suggesting that the review process is similar across fields. However, several veterinary journals have intervals from acceptance to publication approaching 18 months.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- When will I get my paper back? A replication study of publication timelines for health professions education research
L. A. Maggio, W. E. Bynum, … A. R. Artino·bioRxiv·Oct 2, 2019
- Pandemic Publishing: Medical journals drastically speed up their publication process for Covid-19
S. P. J. M. Horbach·Quantitative Science StudiesPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2020
- Reducing publication delay to improve the efficiency and impact of conservation science
A. P. Christie, T. B. White, … W. J. Sutherland·bioRxiv·Mar 30, 2021
- Publishing of COVID-19 Preprints in Peer-reviewed Journals, Preprinting Trends, Public Discussion and Quality Issues
I. Kodvanj, J. Homolak, … V. Trkulja·bioRxiv·Nov 23, 2020
- The Influence of bioRχiv on PLOS ONE's Peer-Review and Acceptance Time
T. Hiroyuki, S. Yuan, … A. Kou·bioRxiv·Jan 28, 2020
- Accelerating Scientific Publication in Biology
Ronald D Vale·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2015