Sign in
Evolutionary BiologyBiological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
Peer-reviewed journal article

Infection dynamics of endosymbionts that manipulate arthropod reproduction

Franziska A. BrenningeriD, Roman ZugiD, Hanna KokkoiD

Abstract

A large proportion of arthropod species are infected with endosymbionts, some of which selfishly alter host reproduction. The currently known forms of parasitic reproductive manipulations are male-killing, feminization, cytoplasmic incompatibility, parthenogenesis induction and distortion of sex allocation. While all of these phenomena represent adaptations that enhance parasite spread, they differ in the mechanisms involved and the consequent infection dynamics. We focus here on the latter aspect, summarizing existing theoretical literature on infection dynamics of all known reproductive manipulation types, and completing the remaining knowledge gaps where dynamics have not been modelled yet. Our unified framework includes the minimal model components required to describe the effects of each manipulation. We establish invasion criteria for all potential combinations of manipulative endosymbionts, yielding predictions for an endosymbionts increase from rarity within a host population that is initially either uninfected or infected with a different symbiont strain. We consider diplodiploid and haplodiploid hosts, as the mechanisms as well as the infection dynamics of reproductive manipulations can differ between them. Our framework reveals that endosymbionts that a priori have the best invasion prospects are not necessarily the most commonly found ones in nature; priority effects play a role too, and cytoplasmic incompatibility excels in this regard. As a whole, considerations of the ease with which a symbiont spreads have to be complemented with knowledge of how easy it is to achieve a particular manipulation, and other factors influencing host switches.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
7
FWCI
0.70
Field percentile
top 43%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.