Developmental BiologyDevelopmental BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Regeneration and Developmental Enhancers Are Differentially Compatible with Minimal Promoters
Ian J. Begeman, Benjamin Freixas EmeryiD, Andrew Kurth, Junsu KangiD
Abstract
Enhancers and promoters are cis-regulatory elements that control gene expression. Enhancers are activated in a cell type-, tissue-, and condition-specific manner to stimulate promoter function and transcription. Zebrafish have emerged as a powerful animal model for examining the activities of enhancers derived from various species through transgenic enhancer assays, in which an enhancer is coupled with a minimal promoter. However, the efficiency of minimal promoters and their compatibility with multiple developmental and regeneration enhancers have not been systematically tested in zebrafish. Thus, we assessed the efficiency of six minimal promoters and comprehensively interrogated the compatibility of the promoters with developmental and regeneration enhancers. We found that the fos minimal promoter and Drosophila synthetic core promoter (DSCP) yielded high rates of leaky expression that may complicate the interpretation of enhancer assays. Notably, the adenovirus E1b promoter, the zebrafish lepb 0.8-kb (P0.8) and lepb 2-kb (P2) promoters, and a new zebrafish synthetic promoter (ZSP) that combines elements of the E1b and P0.8 promoters drove little or no ectopic expression, making them suitable for transgenic assays. We also found significant differences in compatibility among specific combinations of promoters and enhancers, indicating the importance of promoters as key regulatory elements determining the specificity of gene expression. Our study provides guidelines for transgenic enhancer assays in zebrafish to aid in the discovery of functional enhancers regulating development and regeneration.
- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Field percentile
- top 49%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Dynamic modulation of enhancer responsiveness by core promoter elements in living Drosophila embryo
Moe Yokoshi, Koji Kawasaki, … Takashi Fukaya·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Nov 12, 2021
- Splashed E-box and AP-1 motifs cooperatively drive regeneration-response and shape regeneration abilities
Teruhisa Tamaki, Takafumi Yoshida, … Atsushi Kawakami·Biology OpenPeer-reviewed·Jan 13, 2023
- Molecular competition can shape enhancer activity in the Drosophila embryo
Rachel Waymack, Mario Gad, Zeba Wunderlich·iSciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 25, 2021
- Activator-blocker model of transcriptional regulation by pioneer-like factors
Aileen Julia Riesle, Meijiang Gao, … Daria Onichtchouk·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 14, 2023
- A minimal tooth enhancer regulates dlx2b expression during zebrafish tooth formation: insights into cis-regulatory logic in organogenesis
William R. Jackman, Yujin Moon, … Yann Gibert·bioRxiv·Jan 20, 2022
- Two promoters integrate multiple enhancer inputs to drive wild-type knirps expression in the D. melanogaster embryo
Lily Li, Rachel Waymack, … Zeba Wunderlich·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 20, 2021