GeneticsDevelopmental BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Two promoters integrate multiple enhancer inputs to drive wild-type knirps expression in the D. melanogaster embryo
Abstract
Proper development depends on precise spatiotemporal gene expression patterns. Most genes are regulated by multiple enhancers and often by multiple core promoters that generate similar transcripts. We hypothesize that these multiple promoters may be required either because enhancers prefer a specific promoter or because multiple promoters serve as a redundancy mechanism. To test these hypotheses, we studied the expression of the knirps locus in the early Drosophila melanogaster embryo, which is mediated by multiple enhancers and core promoters. We found that one of these promoters resembles a typical "sharp" developmental promoter, while the other resembles a "broad" promoter usually associated with housekeeping genes. Using synthetic reporter constructs, we found that some, but not all, enhancers in the locus show a preference for one promoter. By analyzing the dynamics of these reporters, we identified specific burst properties during the transcription process, namely burst size and frequency, that are most strongly tuned by the specific combination of promoter and enhancer. Using locus-sized reporters, we discovered that even enhancers that show no promoter preference in a synthetic setting have a preference in the locus context. Our results suggest that the presence of multiple promoters in a locus is both due to enhancer preference and a need for redundancy and that "broad" promoters with dispersed transcription start sites are common among developmental genes. Our results also imply that it can be difficult to extrapolate expression measurements from synthetic reporters to the locus context, where many variables shape a genes overall expression pattern.
- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Field percentile
- 48th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Dynamic modulation of enhancer responsiveness by core promoter elements in living Drosophila embryo
Moe Yokoshi, Koji Kawasaki, … Takashi Fukaya·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Nov 12, 2021
- Core promoters restrict pleiotropic enhancer inputs to achieve spatiotemporal specificity in gene expression
Margarita Masoura, Deevitha Balasubramanian, … Yad Ghavi-Helm·bioRxiv·Sep 23, 2025
- The Core Promoter has an active role in interpreting patterning information
Susnata Karmakar, Katherine Millen, Sarah J. Bray·bioRxiv·Oct 13, 2026
- Minimal synthetic enhancers reveal control of the probability of transcriptional engagement and its timing by a morphogen gradient
Armando E. Reimer, Simón Álamos, … Hernán G. García·bioRxiv·Jul 10, 2021
- Pleiotropy in enhancer function is encoded through diverse genetic architectures
Ella Preger‐Ben Noon, Gonzalo Sabarís, … Nicolás Frankel·bioRxiv·Sep 14, 2017
- Computations performed by shadow enhancers and enhancer duplications vary across the Drosophila embryo
Clarissa Scholes, Kelly M. Biette, … Angela H. DePace·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2019