bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Whole brain dimensional approach identifies networks of stress susceptibility in male and female mice.
Lizette Herrera PortilloiD, Daniel Gallino, Yohan YeeiD, Jessie MuiriD, Gabriel A. DevenyiiD, Rosemary C. BagotiD, M. Mallar ChakravartyiD
Abstract
Stress is a major risk factor for depression and anxiety, two highly comorbid disorders with sex differences in symptom presentation and prevalence. Accumulating evidence on the chronic variable stress (CVS) mouse model has revealed that stress susceptibility is sex-specific, as females require less stress exposure (6 days) compared to males (21-28 days) to develop comparable adaptations in depressive- and anxiety-like behaviors. However, the neuroanatomical changes associated with stress susceptibility remain unclear in each sex. Given this differential susceptibility, elucidating these mechanisms requires a phenotype-matched approach in which stress duration is titrated in a sex-specific manner to induce comparable behavioral adaptations. Here, we used a multi-variate brain-behavior and connectomic analysis to examine signatures of stress susceptibility in female and male mice. Using structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we investigate whole-brain neuroanatomical changes associated with behavioral susceptibility within each sex. We then examined the structural connectome underlying neuroanatomical changes associated with behavioral susceptibility within each sex, and putative molecular basis for behaviorally-relevant changes using spatial gene expression analyses. CVS induced significant neuroanatomical changes in regions commonly implicated in anxiety- and depressive-like phenotypes in both sexes (e.g. nucleus accumbens and hippocampus); however qualitative differences between sexes in the direction of change were observed. In addition to these changes, in females stress-induced neuroanatomical changes were associated with both depressive- and anxiety-like behavior, whereas in males we observed two orthogonal dimensions of neuroanatomical changes associated with anxiety-like behavior or social preference. The connectomic topology underlying these brain-behavior dimensions revealed the cortical hub regions for females and subcortical hub regions for males. In females, neuroanatomical changes were associated with genes enriched for protein localization to the cell surface, suggesting alterations in cholinergic signaling By implementing a phenotype-matched CVS protocol, our findings indicate that the neuroanatomical signature of stress susceptibility encompasses similar brain regions across both sexes, however the direction of change, association to behavior and connectomic properties may differ in each sex.
- organism: mouse
- assay: spatial transcriptomics
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Multilevel sex-specific neurobiological signatures of early life adversity
Sowmya V. Narayan, Christina Beer, … Mathias V. Schmidt·bioRxiv·Jan 26, 2026
- Sex differences in chronic social stress models in mice
Orit Furman, Michael Tsoory, Alon Chen·bioRxiv·Apr 11, 2019
- Dynamic behavioral and molecular changes induced by chronic stress exposure in mice
Thomas D. Prévot, Dipashree Chatterjee, … Mounira Banasr·bioRxiv·May 7, 2021
- Sex-Specific Neural Adaptations to Acute and Chronic Restraint Stress in Mice
Ai–Jun Li, Megan McGraw, … Emily Qualls‐Creekmore·bioRxiv·May 20, 2025
- Sex-Dependent Effects of Chronic Stress During Adolescence on Cognitive Bias and Functional Connectome in Young Adult Rats
Twain Dai, Liz Jaeschke-Angi, … Jennifer Rodger·bioRxiv·Apr 3, 2026
- Chronic stress induces sex-specific functional and morphological alterations in cortico-accumbal and cortico-tegmental pathways
Thibault P. Bittar, Mari Carmen Pelaez, … Benoît Labonté·Biological PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Feb 24, 2021