henhaobio
Sign in

Journal of Medical GeneticsGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article

Estimating cancer risk in carriers of Lynch syndrome variants in UK Biobank

Eilidh FummeyiD, Pau NavarroiD, John‐Paul PlazzeriD, Ian M. FraylingiD, Sara KnottiD, Albert TenesaiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

BackgroundLynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited cancer predisposition syndrome caused by genetic variants affecting DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. Cancer risk in LS is estimated from cohorts of individuals ascertained by family history of cancer, which is known to upwardly bias estimates. MethodsThe InSiGHT Database classifies MMR gene variants by pathogenicity through expert panel review of published evidence. 830 carriers of pathogenic or likely pathogenic (path_MMR) MMR gene variants from InSiGHT were identified in 454,756 UK Biobank participants using whole exome sequence. Nelson-Aalen survival analysis was used to estimate cumulative incidence of colorectal, endometrial, and breast cancer. ResultsCumulative incidence of colorectal and endometrial cancer by age 70 was elevated in path_MMR carriers compared to non-carriers (colorectal: 11.8% (95% CI: 9.5 - 14.6) vs. 1.7% (1.6 - 1.7), endometrial: 13.4% (10.2 - 17.6) vs. 1.0% (0.9 - 1.0)), but the magnitude of this increase differed between genes. Cumulative breast cancer incidence by age 70 was not elevated in path_MMR carriers compared to non-carriers (8.9% (6.3 - 12.4) vs. 7.5% (7.4 - 7.6)). Cumulative cancer incidence estimates in UK Biobank were similar to estimates from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database for all genes and cancers, except there was no evidence for elevated endometrial cancer risk in carriers of pathogenic PMS2 variants in UK Biobank. ConclusionThese results can be used to inform the management of incidentally identified cases of LS. For example, they support the application of existing colorectal cancer surveillance strategies for LS in incidentally identified cases.

Citations
29
FWCI
8.76
Field percentile
top 1%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.