Two types of motor inhibition after action errors in humans
Abstract
Adaptive behavior requires the ability to appropriately react to action errors. Post-error slowing of response times (PES) is one of the most reliable phenomena in cognitive neuroscience. It has been proposed that PES is partially achieved through inhibition of the motor system. However, there is no direct evidence for this link - or indeed, that the motor system is physiologically inhibited after errors altogether. Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation and electromyography to measure cortico-spinal excitability (CSE) across four experiments using a Simon task, in which human participants sometimes committed errors. Errors were followed by reduced CSE at two different time points, and in two different modes. Shortly after error commission (250ms) CSE was broadly suppressed - i.e., even task-unrelated motor effectors were inhibited. During the preparation of the subsequent response, CSE was specifically reduced at task-related effectors only. This latter effect was directly related to PES, with stronger CSE suppression accompanying greater PES. This suggests that PES is achieved through increased inhibitory control during post-error responses. To provide converging evidence, we then re-analyzed an openly-available EEG dataset that contained both Simon- and Stop-signal tasks using independent component analysis. We found that the same neural source component that indexed action-cancellation in the stop-signal task also showed clear PES-related activity during post-error responses in the Simon task. Together, these findings provide clear evidence that post-error adaptation is partially achieved through motor inhibition. Moreover, inhibition is engaged in two modes (first non-selective, then selective), aligning with recent multi-stage theories of error processing.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 23
- FWCI
- 2.06
- Field percentile
- top 13%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Early changes in corticomotor excitability underlie proactive inhibitory control of error correction
Borja Rodríguez‐Herreros, Julià L. Amengual, … Toni Cunillera B·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jun 2, 2022
- Latency and amplitude of the stop-signal P3 event-related potential are related to inhibitory GABAa activity in primary motor cortex
Megan Hynd, Cheol Soh, … Jan R. Wessel·bioRxiv·Sep 15, 2020
- Failed stopping transiently suppresses the electromyogram in task-irrelevant muscles
Isaiah Mills, Mitchell Grant Fisher, … Ian Greenhouse·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Motor Output Matters: Evidence of a Continuous Relationship Between Stop/No-go P300 Amplitude and Response Force on Failed Inhibitions at the Trial-Level.
An T. Nguyen, Matthew A. Albrecht, … Welber Marinovic·bioRxiv·Jul 29, 2019
- Post-error slowing reflects the joint impact of adaptive and maladaptive processes during decision making
Fanny Fievez, Gérard Derosière, … Julie Duqué·Frontiers in Human NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 9, 2022
- Non-selective inhibition of the motor system following unexpected and expected infrequent events
Carly Iacullo, Darcy A. Diesburg, Jan R. Wessel·Experimental Brain ResearchPeer-reviewed·Sep 18, 2020