bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Differential glutamatergic and GABAergic responses drive divergent prefrontal cortex neural outcomes to low and high frequency stimulation
Morteza SalimiiD, Milad NazariiD, Jonathan H. MishleriD, Jyoti MishraiD, Dhakshin RamanathaniD
Abstract
BackgroundRepetitive brain stimulation is hypothesized to bidirectionally modulate excitability, with low-frequency trains decreasing and high-frequency (>5 Hz) trains increasing activity. Most insights on the neuroplastic effects of repetitive stimulation protocols stem from non-invasive human studies (TMS/EEG) or data from rodent slice physiology. Here, we developed a rodent experimental preparation enabling simultaneous imaging of cellular activity during stimulation in vivo to understand the mechanisms by which brain stimulation modulates excitability of prefrontal cortex. MethodsRepetitive trains of intracortical stimulation were applied to the medial prefrontal cortex using current parameters mapped to human rTMS electric-field estimates. Calcium imaging of glutamatergic (CamKII) and GABAergic (mDLX) neurons was performed before, during, and after stimulation in awake rodents (n=9 females). Protocols included low-frequency (1 Hz, 1000 pulses) and high-frequency (10 Hz, 3000 pulses), with sham stimulation as a control. ResultsGlutamatergic neurons were differentially modulated by stimulation frequency, with 10 Hz increasing and 1 Hz decreasing activity. Post-stimulation, 1 Hz suppressed both glutamatergic and GABAergic activity, whereas 10 Hz selectively suppressed GABAergic neurons. ConclusionsThese findings provide direct evidence that clinical brain stimulation protocols induce long-term modulation of cortical excitability, with low-frequency stimulation broadly suppressing activity and high-frequency stimulation preferentially inhibiting GABAergic neurons after stimulation.
- organism: mouse
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The effects of direct brain stimulation in humans depend on frequency, amplitude, and white-matter proximity.
Uma R. Mohan, Andrew J. Watrous, … Joshua Jacobs·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·May 21, 2020
- Selective gating of neural modulation through frequency- and behavior-dependent modes during cortical electrical stimulation
Irene Rembado, Soo Yeun Lee, … Costas A. Anastassiou·bioRxiv·Aug 24, 2026
- Intracortical dynamics underlying repetitive stimulation predicts changes in network connectivity
Yuhao Huang, Boglárka Hajnal, … Corey J. Keller·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 10, 2019
- Spatiotemporal recruitment of inhibition and excitation in the mammalian cortex during electrical stimulation
Maria C. Dadarlat, Yujiao Jennifer Sun, Michael P. Stryker·NeuronPeer-reviewed·Dec 21, 2023
- Acute Increase of Excitatory Activity in Pyramidal Neurons of Rat Motor Cortex under Static Magnetic Field
Rebecca C. Klein, Stefan M. Goetz, … Angel V. Peterchev·bioRxiv·Jul 22, 2026
- In vivo low-intensity magnetic pulses durably alter neocortical neuron excitability and spontaneous activity.
Manon Boyer, Paul Baudin, … Séverine Mahon·The Journal of PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 28, 2022