Genome ResearchGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Enhancers display constrained sequence flexibility and context-specific modulation of motif function
Franziska Reiter, Bernardo P. de AlmeidaiD, Alexander StarkiD
Abstract
The information about when and where each gene is to be expressed is mainly encoded in the DNA sequence of enhancers, sequence elements that comprise binding sites (motifs) for different transcription factors (TFs). Most of the research on enhancer sequences has been focused on TF motif presence, while the enhancer syntax, i.e. the flexibility of important motif positions and how the sequence context modulates the activity of TF motifs, remain poorly understood. Here, we explore the rules of enhancer syntax by a two-pronged approach in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells: we (1) replace important motifs by an exhaustive set of all possible 65,536 eight-nucleotide-long random sequences and (2) paste eight important TF motif types into 763 positions within 496 enhancers. These complementary strategies reveal that enhancers display constrained sequence flexibility and the context-specific modulation of motif function. Important motifs can be functionally replaced by hundreds of sequences constituting several distinct motif types, but only a fraction of all possible sequences and motif types restore enhancer activity. Moreover, TF motifs contribute with different intrinsic strengths that are strongly modulated by the enhancer sequence context (the flanking sequence, presence and diversity of other motif types, and distance between motifs), such that not all motif types can work in all positions. The context-specific modulation of motif function is also a hallmark of human enhancers and TF motifs, as we demonstrate experimentally. Overall, these two general principles of enhancer sequences are important to understand and predict enhancer function during development, evolution and in disease.
- organism: Drosophila
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 23
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Short DNA sequence patterns accurately identify broadlyactive human enhancers
Laura L. Colbran, Ling Chen, John A. Capra·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jul 17, 2017
- Mutation of sequences flanking and separating transcription factor binding sites in a Drosophila enhancer significantly alter its output
Xiaoyong Li, Michael B. Eisen·bioRxiv·Jul 30, 2018
- Deciphering the regulatory logic of a Drosophila enhancer through systematic sequence mutagenesis and quantitative image analysis
Yann Le Poul, Yaqun Xin, … Nicolas Gompel·bioRxiv·Jun 24, 2020
- DeepSTARR predicts enhancer activity from DNA sequence and enables the de novo design of enhancers
Bernardo P. de Almeida, Franziska Reiter, … Alexander Stark·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2022
- Context dependent activation and repression of enhancers by Hunchback binding sites in Drosophila embryo
Stefano Ceolin, Monika Hanf, … Ulrike Gaul·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2020
- Information Content Differentiates Enhancers From Silencers in Mouse Photoreceptors
Ryan Z. Friedman, David M. Granas, … Michael A. White·eLifePeer-reviewed·Sep 6, 2021