Genome MedicineBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Cell-type specific subtyping of epigenomes improves prognostic stratification of cancer
Abstract
BackgroundMost molecular classifications of cancer are based on bulk-tissue profiles that measure an average over many distinct cell-types. As such, cancer subtypes inferred from transcriptomic or epigenetic data are strongly influenced by cell-type composition and do not necessarily reflect subtypes defined by cell-type specific cancer-associated alterations, which could lead to suboptimal cancer classifications. MethodsTo address this problem, we here propose the novel concept of cell-type specific combinatorial clustering (CELTYC), which aims to group cancer samples by the molecular alterations they display in specific cell-types. We illustrate this concept in the context of DNA methylation data of liver and kidney cancer, deriving in each case novel cancer subtypes and assessing their prognostic relevance against current state-of-the-art prognostic models. ResultsIn both liver and kidney cancer, we reveal improved cell-type specific prognostic models, not discoverable using standard methods. In the case of kidney cancer, we show how combinatorial indexing of epithelial and immune-cell clusters define improved prognostic models driven by synergy of high mitotic age and altered cytokine signaling. We validate the improved prognostic models in independent datasets, and identify underlying cytokine-immune-cell signatures driving poor outcome. ConclusionsIn summary, cell-type specific combinatorial clustering is a valuable strategy to help dissect and improve current prognostic classifications of cancer in terms of the underlying cell-type specific epigenetic and transcriptomic alterations.
- organism: human
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: protein structure prediction
- research focus: protein design
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- research focus: perturbation response prediction
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 1.79
- Field percentile
- top 16%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Revealing unidentified heterogeneity in different epithelial cancers using heterocellular subtype classification
Pawan Poudel, Gift Nyamundanda, … Anguraj Sadanandam·bioRxiv·Aug 14, 2017
- CancerSubminer: an integrated framework for cancer subtyping using supervised and unsupervised learning on DNA methylation profiles
Joung Min Choi, Liqing Zhang·bioRxiv·Oct 17, 2025
- Pan-cancer analysis reveals embryonic and hematopoietic stem cell signatures to distinguish different cancer subtypes
Jiali Lei, Jiangti Luo, … Xiaosheng Wang·bioRxiv·Jul 5, 2023
- Decoding Liver Cancer Prognosis: From Multi-omics Subtypes, Prognostic Models to Single Cell Validation
Yanbin Wang, Yuqi Wu, … Yanmei Zou·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2024
- Matching cell lines with cancer type and subtype of origin via mutational, epigenomic and transcriptomic patterns
Marina Salvadores, Francisco Fuster‐Tormo, Fran Supek·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2020
- Chromatin Landscape of Cancer Cell Lines Identifies Enhancer Subtypes
Mayinuer Maitituoheti, Emre Arslan, … Kunal Rai·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2026