Science AdvancesGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Matching cell lines with cancer type and subtype of origin via mutational, epigenomic and transcriptomic patterns
Abstract
Cell lines are commonly used as cancer models. Because the tissue and/or cell type of origin provide important context for understanding mechanisms of cancer, we systematically examined whether cell lines exhibit features matching the cancer type that supposedly originated them. To this end, we aligned the mRNA expression and DNA methylation data between [~]9,000 solid tumors and [~]600 cell lines to remove the global differences stemming from growth in cell culture. Next, we created classification models for cancer type and subtype using tumor data, and applied them to cell line data. Overall, the transcriptomic and epigenomic classifiers consistently identified 35 cell lines which better matched a different tissue or cell type than the one the cell line was originally annotated with; we recommend caution in using these cell lines in experimental work. Six cell lines were identified as originating from the skin, of which five were further corroborated by the presence of a UV-like mutational signature in their genome, strongly suggesting mislabelling. Overall, genomic evidence additionally supports that 22 (3.6% of all considered) cell lines may be mislabelled because we predict they originate from a different tissue/cell type. Finally, we cataloged 366 cell lines in which both transcriptomic and epigenomic profiles strongly resemble the tumor type of origin, designating them as golden set cell lines. We suggest these cell lines are better suited for experimental work that depends on tissue identity and propose tentative assignments to cancer subtypes. Finally, we show that accounting for the uncertain tissue-of-origin labels can change the interpretation of drug sensitivity and CRISPR genetic screening data. In particular, in brain, lung and pancreatic cancer cell lines, many novel determinants of drug sensitivity or resistance emerged by focussing on the cell lines that are best matched to the cancer type of interest.
- organism: human
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- assay: DNA methylation
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 71
- FWCI
- 3.51
- Field percentile
- top 4%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Global computational alignment of tumor and cell line transcriptional profiles
A. Warren, A. Jones, … J. M. McFarland·bioRxiv·Mar 25, 2020
- Comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of cell lines as models of primary tumor samples across 22 tumor types
Katharine Yu, Bin Chen, … Marina Sirota·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Aug 8, 2019
- In Search of the Perfect Model: How Cancer Cell Lines Relate to Native Cancers
Rahel Paloots, Ziying Yang, Michael Baudis·bioRxiv·May 15, 2024
- Transcriptional Profiling of Commonly Used Liver Cancer Cell Lines Reveals Disease-Specific Modeling Potential and Authentication Concerns
Nima Sarfaraz, GAIL L. ROSEN, … Michael J. Bouchard·bioRxiv·Oct 30, 2025
- Evaluating cell lines as models for metastatic cancer through integrative analysis of open genomic data
Ke Liu, Patrick A. Newbury, … Bin Chen·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·May 15, 2019
- Cell-type specific subtyping of epigenomes improves prognostic stratification of cancer
Qi Luo, Andrew Erich Teschendorff·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·Apr 3, 2025