Sign in
Molecular BiologyProceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Peer-reviewed journal article

Silencing Doublesex expression triggers three-level pheromonal feminization in Nasonia males

Yidong WangiD, Weizhao SuniD, Sonja Fleischmann, Jocelyn G. MillariD, Joachim RütheriD, Eveline C. VerhulstiD

Abstract

The transcription factor Doublesex (Dsx) has a conserved function in controlling sexual morphological differences in insects, but our knowledge on its role in regulating sexual behavior is widely limited to Drosophila. Here, we show in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis that males whose Dsx gene had been silenced by RNA interference (NvDsx-i) underwent a three-level pheromonal feminization: (1) NvDsx-i males were no longer able to attract females from a distance, owing to drastically reduced titers of the abdominal long-range sex pheromone. (2) NvDsx-i males were courted by wild-type males like females which correlated with a lower abundance of alkenes in their cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profiles. Supplementation of NvDsx-i male CHC profiles with realistic amounts of synthetic (Z)-9-hentriacontene (Z9C31), the most significantly reduced alkene in NvDsx-i males, interrupted courtship by wild-type conspecific males. Supplementation of female CHC profiles with Z9C31 reduced courtship and mating attempts by wild-type males. These results prove that Z9C31 is crucial for sex discrimination in Nasonia. (3) Nvdsx-i males were hampered in eliciting female receptivity during courtship and thus experienced severely reduced mating success, suggesting that they are unable to produce the hitherto unidentified oral aphrodisiac pheromone reported in N. vitripennis males. We conclude that Dsx is a multi-level key regulator of pheromone-mediated sexual communication in N. vitripennis. Silencing Dsx by RNA interference provides a new avenue for unraveling the molecular mechanisms underlying the pheromone-mediated sexual communication in insects.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
16
FWCI
2.54
Field percentile
top 12%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.