When DNA gets in the way in RNA-seq experiments, a sequel

Abstract

Using a newly developed method dubbed SILVER-Seq--enabling extracellular RNA sequencing (exRNA-seq) directly from a small volume of human serum or plasma-- Yan et al. recently reported in Current Biology a potential exRNA biomarker for the early diagnosis of Alzheimers disease [1]. After the publication of the initial paper describing the SILVER-Seq method [2], we reported our concern regarding potential DNA contamination in their datasets [3]. Although the authors replied they were able to successfully treat RNA samples with DNase to avoid such contamination, they did not address our observations of the majority of reads without evidence of being derived from RNA, nor documented verified absence of DNA after DNase treatment [4]. To assess whether the newly data generated may suffer from DNA contamination, we downloaded the publicly available sequencing data and evaluated two quality control metrics (i.e., fraction of exonic and splice reads), which were not reported in the paper. We found that both quality metrics were much lower than expected for RNA-seq data (6.28% exonic and 0.478% splice reads), in line with our previous findings on the first SILVER-Seq paper. These observations suggest the data and results presented by Yan et al. are affected by DNA contamination, an issue that may be inherent to the SILVER-Seq technology.