bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Machine Learning enables efficient and effective affinity maturation of nanobodies
Steffan B. PauliD, Edward P. HarveyiD, James Osei‐OwusuiD, Aaron W. KollaschiD, Adam J. RiesselmaniD, Conor T. McMahoniD, Artem GazizoviD, Murali AnugantiiD, Filmawit Belay, Minh Anh Kieu, Haisun ZhuiD, L. Robert HollingsworthiD, J. Wade HarperiD, Deborah J. MoshinskyiD, Andre A. R. TeixeiraiD, Debora S. MarksiD, Andrew C. KruseiD
Abstract
Antibodies can bind their targets with exquisite potency and selectivity due in part to large antibody-target protein-protein interaction surface areas. Despite the very large size and diversity of synthetic libraries, in vitro sorting alone tends to yield binders with modest affinities. By analogy to the in vivo affinity maturation in the natural immune system, these initial hits are typically affinity matured in vitro to achieve high affinity binding. However, affinity maturation campaigns can be laborious, often requiring multiple selection rounds and strategies for each clone to be optimized. Here, we investigated whether one could accelerate the discovery of optimized binders using machine learning on sequencing data from single selection sorts of affinity maturation yeast-display campaigns. Our results show that sparse sequencing data from a single sorting round can predict sequences that are enriched after multiple rounds. We also find that linear models outperform deep neural networks and semi-supervised approaches in ranking validated affinity-enhancing substitutions. Linear models are also more interpretable, offering insights into residue preferences that can be leveraged for further engineering. We use our models to design and select optimized nanobody binders to relaxin family peptide receptor 1 (RXFP1), yielding multiple improved binders including 3 sub nanomolar binders with the best exhibiting a [~]2500-fold improvement over WT.
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 2
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Antibody affinity engineering using antibody repertoire data and machine learning
Lena Erlach, Simon Friedensohn, … Sai T. Reddy·bioRxiv·Jan 10, 2025
- Machine Learning Optimization of Candidate Antibodies Yields Highly Diverse Sub-nanomolar Affinity Antibody Libraries
Lin Li, Esther Gupta, … Matthew Walsh·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jun 12, 2023
- NanoBEP - A Machine Learning Based Tool for Nanobody Binding Energy Prediction
Soma Prasad Sahoo, Pratibha Manickavasagam, Mrs Priya·bioRxiv·Feb 4, 2025
- Antibody optimization enabled by artificial intelligence predictions of binding affinity and naturalness
Sharrol T. Bachas, Goran Rakocevic, … Roberto Spreafico·bioRxiv·Aug 16, 2022
- A Large Language Model Guides the Affinity Maturation of Variant Antibodies Generated by Combinatorial Optimization
Faisal Bin Ashraf, Zihao Zhang, … Stefano Lonardi·bioRxiv·Dec 19, 2024
- AlphaBind, a Domain-Specific Model to Predict and Optimize Antibody-Antigen Binding Affinity
Aditya A. Agarwal, James Harrang, … Ryan Emerson·mAbsPeer-reviewed·Jul 22, 2025