Sign in
GeneticsbioRxiv
Preprint

From Nagelkerke's R2 to Liability-Scale Variance Explained for Polygenic Scores

Emil UffelmanniD, Peter M. VisscheriD

Abstract

It is desirable to quantify the prediction accuracy of polygenic scores (PGS) for disease on the scale of liability and adjusted for case-control ascertainment in the test sample, because that allows comparison across prevalence and ascertainment. Previous expressions have focused in their derivation and implementation on linear regression on the observed 0-1 scale followed by a transformation of the coefficient of determination (R2) to the scale of liability, adjusted for ascertainment. Yet most statistical analyses with empirical data use logistic regression. The differences in scale have led to confusion and incorrect transformations in the literature. Here we provide a new derivation and simple equation, validated by simulation, that allows a direct transformation from the empirical results from logistic regression to the scale of liability.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISPain '22Mak '17Zhang '24Momin '23Uffelmann '25Lambert '21
67% semantic matchGenetic & Genomic Medicine
Oliver Pain, Alexandra C. Gillett, Jehannine Austin+2 more·European Journal of Human Genetics·Jan 4, 2022· 51 citations