Estimating Disorder Probability Based on Polygenic Prediction Using the BPC Approach
Emil UffelmanniD, Cathryn M. LewisiD, Andrew Mark McIntoshiD, Micheal C. O’Donovan, James WaltersiD, Alkes L. PriceiD, Daniëlle PosthumaiD, Wouter J. PeyrotiD
Abstract
Polygenic Scores (PGSs) summarize an individuals genetic propensity for a given trait in a single value based on SNP effect sizes derived from Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) results. Methods have been developed that apply Bayesian approaches to improve the prediction accuracy of PGSs through optimization of estimated effect sizes. While these methods are generally well-calibrated for continuous traits (implying the predicted values are, on average, equal to the true trait values), they are not well-calibrated for binary disorder traits in ascertained samles. This is a problem because well-calibrated PGSs are needed to reliably compute the absolute disorder probability for an individual to facilitate future clinical implementation. Here, we introduce the Bayesian polygenic score Probability Conversion (BPC) approach, which computes an individuals predicted disorder probability using GWAS summary statistics, an existing Bayesian PGS method (e.g., PRScs, SBayesR), the individuals genotype data, and a prior disorder probability (which can be specified flexibly, based on e.g., literature, small reference samples, or prior elicitation). The BPC approach transforms the PGS to its underlying liability scale, computes the variances of the PGS in cases and controls, and applies Bayes Theorem to compute the absolute disorder probability; it is practical in its application as it does not require a tuning sample with both genotype and phenotype data. We applied the BPC approach to extensive simulated data and empirical data of nine disorders. The BPC approach yielded well-calibrated results that were consistently better than the results of another recently published approach.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 2.33
- Field percentile
- top 11%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Polygenic Prediction via Bayesian Regression and Continuous Shrinkage Priors
Tian Ge, Chia‐Yen Chen, … Jordan W. Smoller·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 16, 2019
- A comparison of ten polygenic score methods for psychiatric disorders applied across multiple cohorts
Guiyan Ni, Jian Zeng, … Vahram H. Haroutunian·Biological PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·May 3, 2021
- Prediction of Polygenic Risks by Screening Thousands of Polygenic Scores
Wei‐Min Chen, Ani W Manichaikul, … Stephen S. Rich·bioRxiv·Oct 3, 2025
- Publicly Available Privacy-preserving Benchmarks for Polygenic Prediction
Menno J. Witteveen, Emil M. Pedersen, … Bjarni Jóhann Vilhjálmsson·bioRxiv·Oct 10, 2022
- A Tool for Translating Polygenic Scores onto the Absolute Scale Using Summary Statistics
Oliver Pain, Alexandra C. Gillett, … Cathryn M. Lewis·European Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 4, 2022
- BayesRB: a Markov chain Monte Carlo-based polygenic genetic risk score algorithm for dichotomous traits
Ying Shan, Daniel E. Weeks·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2022