bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
Greenscreen decreases Type I Errors and increases true peak detection in genomic datasets including ChIP-seq
Abstract
Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) is used widely to identify both factor binding to genomic DNA and chromatin modifications. Analysis of ChIP-seq data is impacted by regions of the genome which generate ultra-high artifactual signals. To remove these signals from ChIP-seq data, ENCODE developed blacklists, comprehensive sets of regions defined by low mappability and ultra-high signals for human, mouse, worm, and flies. Currently, blacklists are not available for many model and non-model species. Here we describe an alternative approach for removing false-positive peaks we called "greenscreen". Greenscreen is facile to implement, requires few input samples, and uses analysis tools frequently employed for ChIP-seq. We show that greenscreen removes artifact signal as effectively as blacklists in Arabidopsis and human ChIP-seq datasets while covering less of the genome, dramatically improving ChIP-seq data quality. Greenscreen filtering reveals true factor binding overlap and of occupancy changes in different genetic backgrounds or tissues. Because it is effective with as few as three inputs, greenscreen is readily adaptable for use in any species or genome build. Although developed for ChIP-seq, greenscreen also identifies artifact signals from other genomic datasets including CUT&RUN. Finally, we present an improved ChIP-seq pipeline which incorporates greenscreen, that detects more true peaks than published methods. One Sentence SummaryA facile method for removing artifact signal from ChIP-seq that improves downstream analyses
- organism: Arabidopsis
- organism: human
- assay: ChIP-seq
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: cell-cell communication
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 2
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Accounting for GC-content bias reduces systematic errors and batch effects in ChIP-Seq data
Mingxiang Teng, Rafael A. Irizarry·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2017
- Ritornello: High fidelity control-free chip-seq peak calling
Kelly Patrick Stanton, Jiaqi Jin, … Yuval Kluger·bioRxiv·Dec 11, 2015
- Chrom-Sig: de-noising 1-dimensional genomic profiles by signal processing methods
N. Gupta, Zachary Apell, Minji Kim·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 27, 2025
- A ChIC solution for ChIP-seq quality assessment
Carmen Maria Livi, Ilario Tagliaferri, … Francesco Ferrari·bioRxiv·May 19, 2020
- SMARTcleaner: identify and clean off-target signals in SMART ChIP-seq analysis
Dejian Zhao, Deyou Zheng·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2018
- High-Throughput ChIPmentation: freely scalable, single day ChIPseq data generation from very low cell-numbers
Charlotte Gustafsson, Ayla De Paepe, … Robert Månsson·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jan 18, 2019