Molecular & Cellular ProteomicsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Fast quantitative analysis of timsTOF PASEF data with MSFragger and IonQuant
Fengchao YuiD, Sarah E. HaynesiD, Guo Ci TeoiD, Dmitry M. AvtonomoviD, Daniel A. PolaskyiD, Alexey I. NesvizhskiiiD
Abstract
Ion mobility brings an additional dimension of separation to liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, improving identification of peptides and proteins in complex mixtures. A recently introduced timsTOF mass spectrometer (Bruker) couples trapped ion mobility separation to time-of-flight mass analysis. With the parallel accumulation serial fragmentation (PASEF) method, the timsTOF platform achieves promising results, yet analysis of the data generated on this platform represents a major bottleneck. Currently, MaxQuant and PEAKS are most commonly used to analyze these data. However, due to the high complexity of timsTOF PASEF data, both require substantial time to perform even standard tryptic searches. Advanced searches (e.g. with many variable modifications, semi- or non-enzymatic searches, or open searches for post-translational modification discovery) are practically impossible. We have extended our fast peptide identification tool MSFragger to support timsTOF PASEF data, and developed a label-free quantification tool, IonQuant, for fast and accurate 4-D feature extraction and quantification. Using a HeLa data set published by Meier et al. (2018), we demonstrate that MSFragger identifies significantly (∼30%) more unique peptides than MaxQuant (1.6.10.43), and performs comparably or better than PEAKS X+ (∼10% more peptides). IonQuant outperforms both in terms of number of quantified proteins while maintaining good quantification precision and accuracy. Runtime tests show that MSFragger and IonQuant can fully process a typical two-hour PASEF run in under 70 minutes on a typical desktop (6 CPU cores, 32 GB RAM), significantly faster than other tools. Finally, through semi-enzymatic searching, we significantly increase the number of identified peptides. Within these semi-tryptic identifications, we report evidence of gas-phase fragmentation prior to MS/MS analysis.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.AbbreviationsLC-MSliquid chromatography-mass spectrometryTIMStrapped ion mobility spectrometryTOFtime-of-flightPASEFparallel accumulation-serial fragmentationDDAdata-dependent acquisitionDIAdata-independent acquisitionMS/MStandem mass spectrometryPSMpeptide-spectrum matchLC-IMS-MSliquid chromatography-ion mobility-mass spectrometryXICextracted ion chromatogramCVcoefficient of variationLFQlabel free quantificationFDRFalse Discovery RateCIDcollision-induced dissociationCPUcentral processing unitPTMpost-translational modificationMBRmatch-between-runsView Full Text
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 377
- FWCI
- 12.12
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Online parallel accumulation - serial fragmentation (PASEF) with a novel trapped ion mobility mass spectrometer
Florian Meier, Andreas‐David Brunner, … Matthias Mann·Molecular & Cellular ProteomicsPeer-reviewed·Nov 5, 2018
- Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry Reduces Spectral Complexity in Mass Spectrometry Based Workflow
Joshua Charkow, Hannes Luc Röst·Analytical ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Dec 9, 2021
- Simplifying MS1 and MS2 spectra to achieve lower mass error, more dynamic range, and higher peptide identification confidence on the Bruker timsTOF Pro
Daryl Wilding‐McBride, Laura F. Dagley, … Andrew Ian Webb·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jul 7, 2022
- Optimized Time-segmented Acquisition Expands Peptide and Protein Identification in TIMS-TOF Pro Mass Spectrometry
Huoming Zhang, Dalila Bensaddek·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 22, 2025
- Comparison of TIMS-PASEF quantitative proteomics data-analysis workflows using FragPipe, DIA-NN, and Spectronaut from a user's perspective
Alejandro Fernández-Vega, Federica Farabegoli, … Ignacio Ortea·bioRxiv·Nov 29, 2021
- A de novo MS1 feature detector for the Bruker timsTOF Pro
Daryl Wilding‐McBride, Andrew Ian Webb·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Nov 30, 2022