bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Imputation strategy for population DNA methylation sequencing data
Alexandre DuplaniD, Shannon BrandtiD, Abel GarnieriD, Jörg TostiD, Leopoldo SáncheziD, Ludovic DuvauxiD, Stéphane MauryiD, Harold DurufléiD
Abstract
BackgroundDNA methylation is a central epigenetic mechanism involved in regulating gene expression and responses to environmental factors. Although it can sometimes be passed down through generations, its heritability remains variable depending on the species and biological context. These characteristics make it a key marker for studying genotype-environment interactions. However, whole-genome sequencing for DNA methylation analysis remains costly when applied to large numbers of individuals, prompting researchers to focus on specific regions of interest. This targeted approach often results in data matrices with missing values for some individuals, which can hinder downstream analyses. ResultsOur study used 200 and 189 poplar and oak individuals from natural populations, respectively. We tested and compared seven methods for missing data imputation in the specific context of targeted DNA methylation sequencing data obtained in the three different DNA methylation contexts in plants (CpG, CHG, and CHH). The comparison of the different imputation result allows to evaluate their performance to determine the most suitable approach for this type of data. Among them, NIPALS, MissForest, and LOESS provided the highest accuracy. NIPALS delivered the best overall performance but with moderate computational cost, MissForest achieved similar accuracy with faster computation, and LOESS offered competitive results suitable for large datasets. ConclusionsOur results provide a reference for the selection of imputation strategies in targeted sequencing studies, improving the reliability of DNA methylation analyses and broadening the applicability of this type of data in epigenomic research. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=127 SRC="FIGDIR/small/644107v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (22K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c98f47org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1dd9cfborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6d3a43org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10c1d8b_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Imputing not available values in single-cell DNA methylation data using the median is straightforward and effective
Songming Tang, Siyu Li, Shengquan Chen·Quantitative BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2025
- slideimp: Efficient Imputation for DNA Methylation Data
Hung Pham, Adam Lombroso, … Kieran J. O’Donnell·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·May 20, 2026
- GIMMEcpg: Global Imputation of Mean CpG MEthylation in Real-time
Ismail Moghul, Niuzheng Chai, … Stephan Beck·bioRxiv·Mar 17, 2025
- Cross-species and tissue imputation of species-level DNA methylation samples across mammalian species.
Emily Maciejewski, Steve Horvath, Jason Ernst·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·May 20, 2025
- CUE: CpG impUtation Ensemble for DNA Methylation Levels Across the Human Methylation450 (HM450) and EPIC (HM850) BeadChip Platforms
Gang Li, Laura M. Raffield, … Yun Li·EpigeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 4, 2020
- METHimpute: Imputation-guided construction of complete methylomes from WGBS data
Aaron Taudt, David Roquis, … Maria Colomé‐Tatché·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jun 7, 2018