Magnetic Resonance ImagingBioengineeringPeer-reviewed journal article
Exploiting Four-way Phase-encoding Benefits for Robust Detection and Correction of EPI artifacts: Application to Residual Ghosts in Diffusion MRI.
Anh Thai, Lin‐Ching ChangiD, Carlo M. PierpaoliiD, Mustafa Okan IrfanogluiD
Abstract
PurposeTo propose and develop an image processing-based methodology for detecting and correcting echo planar imaging (EPI) artifact that employs data from 4-way phase-encoding acquisitions. ApproachPrevious studies have demonstrated that acquiring images with four different phase-encoding directions can improve the reproducibility of diffusion derived quantitative maps while retaining the same acquisition time. This improvement is achieved by averaging across phase-encoding directions (PEDs) to reduce the impact of EPI artifacts. Building on this principle, the proposed method further improves this 4-way encoding approach by leveraging the properties of signal distributions to detect artifactual regions. Additionally, the method can be tailored for specific artifact manifestations by considering their localization due to underlying acquisition parameters. The proposed method is applied to and validated using both simulated data and in-vivo diffusion MRI data affected by residual ghost artifacts. ResultsSimulations with known ground-truth images demonstrated high artifact detection accuracy, achieving a Dice score of 0.91 for reconstructions without parallel imaging. In the in-vivo dataset, the method also improved longitudinal reproducibility, reducing variability by 30% in ghost-affected regions. ConclusionThe proposed correction method effectively detected and corrected residual ghost artifacts without the need of any additional k-space data. This retrospective approach can be directly integrated into existing processing pipelines to further improve the quality of EPI images and enhancing image quality in studies that utilize 4-way PEDs acquisition.
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.52
- Field percentile
- top 40%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Anatomy-guided Inverse-phase-encoding Registration Method for Correcting Susceptibility Artifacts in Sub-millimeter fMRI
Soan T. M. Duong, Son Lam Phung, … Mark M. Schira·bioRxiv·Sep 23, 2019
- Correction of susceptibility distortion in EPI: a semi-supervised approach with deep learning.
Antoine Legouhy, Mark S. Graham, … Hui Gary Zhang·bioRxiv·Jul 12, 2022
- EPI Distortion Correction is Easy and Useful, and You Should Use It: A case study with toddler data
V. Roopchansingh, J. J. French, … A. E. Thurm·bioRxiv·Sep 28, 2020
- Eddy current-induced artifacts correction in high gradient strength diffusion MRI with dynamic field monitoring: demonstration in ex vivo human brain imaging
G. Ramos Llorden, D. Park, … S. Y. Huang·bioRxiv·Feb 15, 2023
- Field-Correcting GRAPPA (FCG): a technique to correctspatiotemporal-varying phase errors in Echo Planar Imaging
Nan Wang, Daniel Abraham, … Kawin Setsompop·bioRxiv·Jul 10, 2026
- Advancing High-Resolution 7T Diffusion MRI: Evaluating Phase-Encoding Correction Strategies for Distortion Correction from Basic to Four-Way Acquisitions
Kurt G. Schilling, Alexander J. S. Beckett, … An T. Vu·Magnetic Resonance ImagingPeer-reviewed·Apr 17, 2026