bioRxivCancer BiologyPreprint
Basic region variants of the MAX b-HLH-LZ preferentially form heterodimers with the MYC b-HLH-LZ to bind the E-box rather than binding as homodimers.
Abstract
The MYC associated factor X (MAX) is the heterodimeric partner of the MYC paralogs (MYC, MYCN and MYCL). When deregulated, high level of the MYC paralogs contribute to all aspects of tumorigenesis and tumor growth. MAX can also heterodimerize with the MXD proteins, MNT and MGA. Heterodimerization and sequence specific DNA binding to the E-Box sequences at gene promoters is controlled by their heterodimerization with the MAX b-HLH-LZ. As a heterodimer with MAX, MYC proteins activate genes involved in cell metabolism, growth and proliferation whereas MXD proteins, MNT and MGA repress them. MAX can also bind to the E-Bos sequence as a homodimer. Being devoid of a transactivation domain it can act as an antagonist of the MYC/MAX heterodimers. Variants of MAX have been reported to be linked to cancer. These variants are either not expressed, inactivated or lead to missense mutations. This has led to the notion that MAX may have a tumor suppressor role. Here, we characterize three of those variants with missense mutations in the basic region, i.e. E32K, R35P and R35C. We analyzed their heterodimerization with the b-HLH-LZ of MYC and their DNA binding properties as homo-and heterodimers. The R35C variant b-HLH-LZ was found to have a markedly increased affinity for the b-HLH-LZ of MYC. We also observed that all three b-HLH-LZ variants have a lower affinity as homodimers for the E-Box than the WT. This was shown to lead to a preferential binding of all the heterodimeric b-LHLH-LZ to the E-Box. This effect is exacerbated in the case of the R35C variant. We argue that this preferential binding of MYC as heterodimers with these variants to E-Box sequences could contribute to tumorigenesis. Hence, our results suggest that, mechanistically, the MAX homodimer bound to the E-Box could act as a tumor suppressor.
- organism: human
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: chromatin & epigenetic regulation
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Max deletion destabilizes MYC protein and abrogates Eμ-Myc lymphomagenesis
H. Mathsyaraja, B. Freie, … R. N. Eisenman·bioRxiv·Feb 21, 2019
- Intrinsically disordered regions in the transcription factor MYC:MAX modulate DNA binding via intramolecular interactions
S. Schuetz, C. Bergsdorf, … W. Jahnke·bioRxiv·Jun 21, 2023
- The E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MDM2 is a novel interactor of the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor
A. Falconieri, G. Minervini, … S. C. E. Tosatto·bioRxiv·Apr 28, 2020
- MXD/MIZ1 complexes activate transcription of MYC-repressed genes
Anton Shostak, Géza Schermann, … Michael Brunner·bioRxiv·Nov 15, 2019
- Strategies for Overcoming the Purification Challenges of Meis1 and HoxA9 and Their Functional Characterization
Ibukunoluwa Abigail Olaosebikan, Kevin C. Courtney, Hacer Karataş·bioRxiv·Oct 29, 2026
- Heterozygous Kmt2d loss diminishes enhancers to render medulloblastoma cells vulnerable to combinatory inhibition of lysine demethylation and oxidative phosphorylation
S. S. Dhar, C. Brown, … M. Lee·bioRxiv·Oct 29, 2023