PLoS Computational BiologyBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Knotted artifacts in predicted 3D RNA structures
Bartosz A. GreniD, Maciej AntczakiD, Tomasz ŻokiD, Joanna Ida SulkowskaiD, Marta SzachniukiD
Abstract
Unlike proteins, RNAs deposited in the Protein Data Bank do not contain topological knots. Recently, admittedly, the first trefoil knot and some lasso-type conformations have been found in experimental RNA structures, but these are still exceptional cases. Meanwhile, algorithms predicting 3D RNA models have happened to form knotted structures not so rarely. Interestingly, machine learning-based predictors seem to be more prone to generate knotted RNA folds than traditional methods. A similar situation is observed for the entanglements of structural elements. In this paper, we analyze all models submitted to the CASP15 competition in the 3D RNA structure prediction category. We show what types of topological knots and structure element entanglements appear in the submitted models and highlight what methods are behind the generation of such conformations. We also study the structural aspect of susceptibility to entanglement. We suggest that predictors take care of an evaluation of RNA models to avoid publishing structures with artifacts, such as unusual entanglements, that result from hallucinations of predictive algorithms. Author summaryO_LI3D RNA structure prediction contests such as CASP and RNA-Puzzles lack measures for topology-wise evaluation of predicted models. Thus, predictors happen to submit potentially inappropriate conformations, for example, containing entanglements that are prediction artifacts. C_LIO_LIAutomated identification of entanglements in 3D RNA structures is computationally hard. Distinguishing correct from incorrectly entangled conformations is not trivial and often requires expert knowledge. C_LIO_LIWe analyzed 3D RNA models submitted to CASP15 and found that all entanglements in these models are artifacts. C_LIO_LICompared to non-ML, machine learning-based methods are more prone to generating entanglements that are not present in natural RNAs. C_LIO_LITo increase the reliability of 3D RNA structure prediction, it is necessary to reject abnormally entangled structures in the modeling stage. C_LI
- assay: protein structure
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: benchmark study
- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Field percentile
- top 23%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Assessment of three-dimensional RNA structure prediction in CASP15
R. Das, R. C. Kretsch, … E. Westhof·bioRxiv·Apr 25, 2023
- RNAtive to recognize native-like structure in a set of RNA 3D models
Jan Pielesiak, Maciej Antczak, … Tomasz Żok·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 29, 2025
- Predicting RNA 3D structure and conformers using a pre-trained secondary structure model and structure-aware attention
Wenkai Wang, Zhenling Peng, Jianyi Yang·Nature Machine IntelligencePeer-reviewed·Apr 21, 2026
- FebRNA: an automated fragment-ensemble-based model for building RNA 3D structures
- RNA secondary structure prediction with Convolutional Neural Networks
Mehdi Saman Booy, Alexander Ilin, Pekka Orponen·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 2, 2022
- A Comparative Review of Deep Learning Methods for RNA Tertiary Structure Prediction
Ivona Martinović, Tin Vlašić, … Mile Šikić·bioRxiv·Nov 27, 2024