tACS entrains neural activity while somatosensory input is blocked
Pedro Gabrielle VieiraiD, Matthew R. KrauseiD, Christopher C. PackiD
Abstract
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) modulates brain activity by passing electrical current through electrodes that are attached to the scalp. Because it is safe and non-invasive, it holds great promise as a tool for basic research and clinical treatment. However, little is known about how tACS ultimately influences neural activity. One hypothesis is that tACS affects neural responses directly, by producing electrical fields that interact with the brains endogenous electrical activity. Since the shape and location of these electric fields can be controlled, stimulation could be targeted at brain regions associated with particular behaviors or symptoms. However, an alternative hypothesis is that tACS affects neural activity indirectly, via peripheral sensory afferents. In particular, it has often been hypothesized that tACS acts on nerve fibers in the skin, which in turn provide rhythmic input to central neurons. In this case, there would be little possibility of targeted brain stimulation, as the regions modulated by tACS would depend entirely on the somatosensory pathways originating in the skin around the stimulating electrodes. Here, we directly test these competing hypotheses by recording single-unit activity in the hippocampus and visual cortex of monkeys receiving tACS. We find that tACS entrains neuronal activity in both regions, so that cells fire synchronously with the stimulation. Blocking somatosensory input with a topical anesthetic does not significantly alter these neural entrainment effects. These data are therefore consistent with the direct stimulation hypothesis and suggest that peripheral somatosensory stimulation is not required for tACS to entrain neurons.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 98
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Field percentile
- top 2%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation on spiking activity in computational models of single neocortical neurons
Harry Tran, Sina Shirinpour, Alexander Opitz·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jan 29, 2022
- Brain stimulation competes with ongoing oscillations for control of spike timing in the primate brain
Matthew R. Krause, Pedro Gabrielle Vieira, … Christopher C. Pack·bioRxiv·Oct 1, 2021
- Transcranial alternating current stimulation does not modulate corticospinal activity in humans
Jaime Ibáñez, Blanka Zicher, … Dario Farina·bioRxiv·Jan 13, 2022
- Superiority of Rhythmic Auditory Signals over Electrical Stimulation to Entrain Behavior
Yuranny Cabral‐Calderín, Molly J. Henry·bioRxiv·Aug 12, 2024
- Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) Entrains Alpha Oscillations by Preferential Phase Synchronization of Fast-Spiking Cortical Neurons to Stimulation Waveform
Ehsan Negahbani, Iain Stitt, … Flavio Frӧhlich·bioRxiv·Feb 28, 2019
- Intensity- and frequency-specific effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation are explained by network dynamics
Zhihe Zhao, Sina Shirinpour, … Alexander Opitz·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Mar 26, 2024