BlotIt - Optimal alignment of western blot and qPCR experiments
Svenja KemmeriD, Severin BangiD, Marcus RosenblattiD, Jens TimmeriD, Daniel KaschekiD
Abstract
Biological systems are frequently analyzed by means of mechanistic mathematical models. In order to infer model parameters and provide a useful model that can be employed for systems understanding and hypothesis testing, the model is often calibrated on quantitative, time-resolved data. To do so, it is typically important to compare experimental measurements over broad time ranges and various experimental conditions, e.g. perturbations of the biological system. However, most of the established experimental techniques such as Western blot, or quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction only provide measurements on a relative scale, since different sample volumes, experimental adjustments or varying development times of a gel lead to systematic shifts in the data. In turn, the number of measurements corresponding to the same scale enabling comparability is limited. Here, we present a new flexible method to align measurement data that obeys different scaling factors. We propose an alignment model to estimate these scaling factors and provide the possibility to adapt this model depending on the measurement technique of interest. In addition, an error model can be specified to adequately weight the different data points and obtain scaling-model based confidence intervals of the finally scaled data points. Our approach is applicable to all sorts of relative measurements and does not need a particular experimental condition that has been measured over all available scales. An implementation of the method is provided with the R package blotIt including refined ways of visualization.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Field percentile
- top 39%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Improving rigor and reproducibility in western blot experiments with the blotRig analysis software
Cleopa Omondi, Austin Chou, … Adam R. Ferguson·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Sep 17, 2024
- WispLab: open-source browser workbenches for laboratory image and qPCR analysis with reference-based verification
- Titration-WB: A methodology for accurate quantitative protein determination overcoming reproducibility errors
Alice Maestri, Ewa Ehrenborg, … Paolo Parini·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jun 12, 2025
- A Novel Method and Simple On-line Tool for Maximum Likelihood Calibration of Immunoblots and other Measurements that are Quantified in Batches
Steven S Andrews, Suzannah Rutherford·bioRxiv·Sep 2, 2015
- Validating Antibodies for Quantitative Western Blot Measurements with Microwestern Array
R. J. Koch, A. M. Barrette, … M. R. Birtwistle·bioRxiv·Nov 17, 2017
- Optimizing reduction of Western blotting analytical variations: use of replicate test samples, multiple normalization methods, and sample loading positions
R. J. Lowy, P. A. Rees·bioRxiv·Dec 16, 2020