bioRxivGeneticsPreprint
Rare instances of non-random dropout with the monochrome multiplex qPCR assay for mitochondrial DNA copy number
Stephanie Y. YangiD, Charles NewcombiD, Stephanie L. BattleiD, Anthony Y.Y. Hsieh, Hailey L. Chapman, Hélène C F CôtéiD, Dan E. ArkingiD
Abstract
Mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNA-CN) is a proxy for mitochondrial function and has been of increasing interest to the mitochondrial research community. There are a number of ways to measure mtDNA-CN, ranging from qPCR to whole genome sequencing [1]. A recent article in the Journal of Molecular Diagnostics [2] described a novel method for measuring mtDNA-CN that is both inexpensive and reproducible. After adapting the assay for use in our lab, we have found it to be reproducible and well-correlated with mtDNA-CN derived from whole genome sequencing. However, certain individuals show poor concordance between the two measures, particularly individuals with qPCR mtDNA-CN measurements >3 standard deviations below the sample mean, which corresponds to roughly 1% of assayed individuals (Figure 1). After examining whole genome sequencing data, this seems to be due to specific polymorphisms within the D-loop primer region, at positions MT 338, 340, 452, 457, 458, 460, 461, 466, and 467. All individuals with a variant in at least one of these positions have non-concordant mtDNA-CN measurements. Meanwhile, variants observed at other positions within the primer region do not appear to cause dropout. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=113 SRC="FIGDIR/small/463983v1_fig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (16K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@134ca51org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ce9196org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b82af6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c9701_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 1.C_FLOATNO Discrepancy between the monochrome multiplex qPCR mtDNA-CN and the whole genome sequencing mtDNA-CN for 1,732 distinct individuals. Data are centered at 0 and scaled so that the standard deviation = 1. The dotted red line represents 3 standard deviations beneath the sample mean. Individuals in the U, L1, L4, and T haplogroups have a disproportionately higher risk of discordant measures between the two assays. C_FIG
- organism: human
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 2
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evaluation of mitochondrial DNA copy number estimation techniques
Ryan J. Longchamps, Christina A. Castellani, … Dan E. Arking·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jan 31, 2020
- Assessing reliability and accuracy of qPCR, dPCR and ddPCR for estimating mtDNA copy number in songbird blood and sperm cells
Laima Bagdonaitė, Erica H. Leder, … Quentin Mauvisseau·bioRxiv·Nov 8, 2024
- Quantitative mitochondrial DNA copy number determination using droplet digital PCR with single cell resolution: a focus on aging and cancer
Ryan A. O’Hara, Enzo Tedone, … Jerry W. Shay·bioRxiv·Mar 16, 2019
- The genetic and phenotypic correlates of mtDNA copy number in a multi-ancestry cohort
Arslan A. Zaidi, Anurag Verma, … Iain Mathieson·Human Genetics and Genomics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·May 9, 2023
- A Bioinformatics Pipeline for Estimating Mitochondria DNA Copy Number and Heteroplasmy Levels from Whole Genome Sequencing Data
Stephanie L. Battle, Daniela Puiu, … Dan E. Arking·NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 31, 2022
- Characterizing mitochondrial copy number variation and PCR amplification bias as sources of quantitative constraints in DNA metabarcoding
Lisa Wolany, Kevin Klinkenborg, … Dominik Buchner·bioRxiv·Aug 17, 2026