Alternative hydrogen uptake pathways suppress methane production in ruminants
Chris GreeningiD, Renae Geier, Cecilia Wang, Laura C. WoodsiD, Sergio E. MoralesiD, Michael J. McDonald, Rowena Rushton-Green, Xochitl C. MorganiD, Satoshi Koike, Sinead C. Leahy, William J. Kelly, Isaac CanniD, Graeme T. AttwoodiD, Gregory M. Cook, Roderick I. Mackie
Abstract
Farmed ruminants are the largest source of anthropogenic methane emissions globally. The methanogenic archaea responsible for these emissions use molecular hydrogen (H2), produced during bacterial and eukaryotic carbohydrate fermentation, as their primary energy source. In this work, we used comparative genomic, metatranscriptomic, and co-culture-based approaches to gain a system-wide understanding of the organisms and pathways responsible for ruminal H2 metabolism. Two thirds of sequenced rumen bacterial and archaeal genomes encode enzymes that catalyze H2 production or consumption, including 26 distinct hydrogenase subgroups. Metatranscriptomic analysis confirmed that these hydrogenases are differentially expressed in sheep rumen. Electron-bifurcating [FeFe]-hydrogenases from carbohydrate-fermenting Clostridia (e.g. Ruminococcus) accounted for half of all hydrogenase transcripts. Various H2 uptake pathways were also expressed, including methanogenesis (Methanobrevibacter), fumarate reduction and nitrate ammonification (Selenomonas), and acetogenesis (Blautia). Whereas methanogenesis predominated in high methane yield sheep, alternative uptake pathways were significantly upregulated in low methane yield sheep. Complementing these findings, we observed significant differential expression and activity of the hydrogenases of the hydrogenogenic cellulose fermenter Ruminococcus albus and the hydrogenotrophic fumarate reducer Wolinella succinogenes in co-culture compared to pure culture. We conclude that H2 metabolism is a more complex and widespread trait among rumen microorganisms than previously recognized. There is evidence that alternative hydrogenotrophs, including acetogens and selenomonads, can prosper in the rumen and effectively compete with methanogens for H2 in low methane yield ruminants. Strategies to increase flux through alternative H2 uptake pathways, including animal selection, dietary supplementation, and methanogenesis inhibitors, may lead to sustained methane mitigation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Red seaweed supplementation suppresses methanogenesis in the rumen, revealing potentially advantageous traits among hydrogenotrophic bacteria
Pengfan Zhang, Breanna Michell Roque, … Matthias Hess·MicrobiomePeer-reviewed·Nov 13, 2025
- The Rumen Metatranscriptome Landscape Reflects Dietary Adaptation and Methanogenesis in Lactating Dairy Cows
Bastian Hornung, Bartholomeus van den Bogert, … Hauke Smidt·bioRxiv·Mar 3, 2018
- Shifts in ruminant fermentation during inhibition of methanogenesis are reflected in the isotope compositions of volatile fatty acids.
Elliott P. Mueller, Rich A. Duong, … Alex L. Sessions·Applied and Environmental MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·May 29, 2026
- Methanogenesis inhibition remodels microbial fermentation and stimulates acetogenesis in ruminants
Gaofeng Ni, Min Wang, … Chris Greening·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Oct 6, 2025
- Effect of different forage-to-concentrate ratios on the structure of rumen bacteria and its relationship with nutrition levels and real-time methane production in sheep
- Changes in rumen microbiota of cows in response to dietary supplementation with nitrate, linseed and saponin alone or in combination.
Milka Popova, Jessie Guyader, … Diego Pablo Morgavi·Applied and Environmental MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 3, 2018