Performance of shotgun metagenomic sequencing for detection of fungi and parasites across clinical sample types: a multicenter retrospective study.
Théo Ghelfenstein-FerreiraiD, Cécile AngebaultiD, Vanessa Démontant, Laure Boizeau, Sandrine HouzéiD, Christophe RodrigueziD, Françoise BottereliD
Abstract
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of clinical shotgun metagenomic sequencing (SMg) for detecting medically relevant fungi and parasites compared with standard of care (SoC), and to define read-based thresholds for interpretation, we retrospectively analyzed 198 clinical samples from 187 patients across four university hospitals (2018-2022): blood (n=37), faeces (n=63), respiratory fluids (n=54), other biological fluids (n=24), and tissue biopsies (n=20). Total nucleic acids were sequenced ([≥]10 million reads per library) and processed with MetaMIC v2.2.1. Data were normalized as reads per million (RPM). Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to derive optimal RPM thresholds by sample type. SoC identified microorganisms in 152/198 samples (76.8%). All 46 SoC-negative samples were also negative by SMg. At the genus level, SoC identified 187 taxa and SMg 175. Of these, 147 (78.6%) were detected by both methods, 40 (21.4%) by SoC only, and 28 (14.9%) by SMg only. The overall genus-level F1-score was 0.84. Quantification cycle (Cq) values (n=57) correlated inversely with RPM (p<0.001), and no false negatives occurred with Cq<28.6. Optimal thresholds were 0.06 RPM for faeces (AUC 0.89), 0.07 for respiratory fluids (AUC 0.93; sensitivity 88.9%, specificity 90.7%), 0.09 for blood (AUC 0.99), 0.19 for other fluids (AUC 0.94), and 0.57 for biopsies (AUC 0.89). A global threshold of 0.06 RPM yielded an AUC of 0.92 (sensitivity 88.9%, specificity 88.5%). A pragmatic uniform 0.1 RPM threshold maintained performance, while sample-type specific thresholds further improved accuracy, supporting standardized implementation of clinical metagenomics for fungal and parasitic diagnostics.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Hunting for Helminths: short- and long-read shotgun metagenomics for parasite detection in faecal samples
Katie O’Brien, Ajay Elamaran, … Vicky L. Hunt·bioRxiv·Mar 10, 2026
- Analytical Assessment of Metagenomic Workflows for Pathogen Detection with NIST RM 8376 and Two Sample Matrices
Jason G. Kralj, Stephanie L. Servetas, … Scott A. Jackson·Microbiology SpectrumPeer-reviewed·Mar 10, 2025
- Combined use of metagenomic sequencing and host response profiling for the diagnosis of suspected sepsis.
H. K. Cheng, S. K. Tan, … D. A. Relman·bioRxiv·Dec 9, 2019
- An Optimized Pipeline for Detection of Salmonella Sequences in Shotgun Metagenomics Datasets
Lauren M. Bradford, Catherine D. Carrillo, Alex Wong·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2023
- Speed, accuracy, sensitivity and quality control choices for detecting clinically relevant microbes in whole blood from patients.
George S. Watts, James E. Thornton, … Bonnie L. Hurwitz·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 22, 2019
- Considerations for performance metrics of metagenomic next generation sequencing analyses
Jason G. Kralj, Stephanie L. Servetas, … Scott A. Jackson·bioRxiv·Dec 17, 2020