Deciphering Bacterial and Archaeal Transcriptional Dark Matter and Its Architectural Complexity
John MattickiD, Robin E. BromleyiD, Kaylee J. WatsoniD, Ricky S. AdkinsiD, Christopher I. HoltiD, Jarrett F. LeboviD, Benjamin C. SparkliniD, Tyonna S. Tyson, David A. RaskoiD, Julie C. Dunning HotoppiD
Abstract
Transcripts are potential therapeutic targets, yet bacterial transcripts remain biological dark matter with uncharacterized biodiversity. We developed and applied an algorithm to predict transcripts for Escherichia coli K12 and E2348/69 strains (Bacteria:gamma-Proteobacteria) with newly generated ONT direct RNA sequencing data while predicting transcripts for Listeria monocytogenes strains Scott A and RO15 (Bacteria:Firmicute), Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains SG17M and NN2 strains (Bacteria:gamma-Proteobacteria), and Haloferax volcanii (Archaea:Halobacteria) using publicly available data. From >5 million E. coli K12 ONT direct RNA sequencing reads, 2,484 mRNAs are predicted and contain more than half of the predicted E. coli proteins. While the number of predicted transcripts varied by strain based on the amount of sequence data used for the predictions, across all strains examined, the average size of the predicted mRNAs is 1.6-1.7 kbp while the median size of the predicted bacterial 5-and 3-UTRs are 30-90 bp. Given the lack of bacterial and archaeal transcript annotation, most predictions are of novel transcripts, but we also predicted many previously characterized mRNAs and ncRNAs, including post-transcriptionally generated transcripts and small RNAs associated with pathogenesis in the E. coli E2348/69 LEE pathogenicity islands. We predicted small transcripts in the 100-200 bp range as well as >10 kbp transcripts for all strains, with the longest transcript for two of the seven strains being the nuo operon transcript, and for another two strains it was a phage/prophage transcript. This quick, easy, inexpensive, and reproducible method will facilitate the presentation of operons, transcripts, and UTR predictions alongside CDS and protein predictions in bacterial genome annotation as important resources for the research community.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Analysis of next- and third-generation RNA-Seq data reveals the structures of alternative transcription units in bacterial genomes
Qi Wang, Zhao-Qian Liu, … Bingqiang Liu·bioRxiv·Jan 2, 2021
- Predicting microbial transcriptome using annotated genome sequence
- rSeqTU -- a machine-learning based R package for prediction of bacterial transcription units
Sheng-Yong Niu, Binqiang Liu, … Wen‐Chi Chou·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 15, 2019
- Common and phylogenetically widespread coding for peptides by bacterial small RNAs
Robin C Friedman, Stefan Kalkhof, … Benno Schwikowski·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2015
- PredicTF: a tool to predict bacterial transcription factors in complex microbial communities.
Lummy Maria Oliveira Monteiro, J. Saraiva, … Ulisses Nunes da Rocha·bioRxiv·Jan 28, 2021
- Inference of bacterial small RNA regulatory networks and integration with transcription factor driven regulatory networks
Mario L. Arrieta‐Ortiz, Christoph Hafemeister, … Patrick Eichenberger·mSystemsPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2020