henhaobio
Sign in

Journal of Investigative DermatologyDevelopmental BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article

Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy Quantifies Skin Barrier Function in Organotypic In Vitro Epidermis Models

Noa J.M. van den BrinkiD, Felicitas PardowiD, Luca D. MeestersiD, Ivonne M.J.J. van Vlijmen‐WillemsiD, Diana Rodijk‐OlthuisiD, Hanna NiehuesiD, Patrick A.M. JanseniD, Susan H. RoelofsiD, Matthew G. BreweriD, Ellen H. J. van den BogaardiD, Jos P.H. SmitsiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

3 D human epidermal equivalents (HEEs) are a state-of-the-art organotypic culture model in pre- clinical investigative dermatology and regulatory toxicology. Here, we investigated the utility of electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) for non-invasive measurement of HEE epidermal barrier function. Our setup comprised a custom-made lid fit with 12 electrode pairs aligned on the standard 24-transwell cell culture system. Serial EIS measurements for seven consecutive days did not impact epidermal morphology and readouts showed comparable trends to HEEs measured only once. We determined two frequency ranges in the resulting impedance spectra: a lower frequency range termed EISdiff correlated with keratinocyte terminal differentiation independent of epidermal thickness and a higher frequency range termed EISSC correlated with stratum corneum thickness. HEEs generated from CRISPR/Cas9 engineered keratinocytes that lack key differentiation genes FLG, TFAP2A, AHR or CLDN1 confirmed that keratinocyte terminal differentiation is the major parameter defining EISdiff. Exposure to pro-inflammatory psoriasis- or atopic dermatitis-associated cytokine cocktails lowered the expression of keratinocyte differentiation markers and reduced EISdiff. This cytokine-associated decrease in EISdiff was normalized after stimulation with therapeutic molecules. In conclusion, EIS provides a non- invasive system to consecutively and quantitatively assess HEE barrier function and to sensitively and objectively measure barrier development, defects and repair.

Citations
22
FWCI
3.83
Field percentile
top 5%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.