henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivCell Biology

Age-structure as key to delayed logistic proliferation of scratch assays

A. V. Ponce Bobadilla, T. Carraro, H. M. Byrne, P. K. Maini, T. Alarcon

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Scratch assays are in-vitro methods for studying cell migration. In these experiments, a scratch is made on a cell monolayer and recolonisation of the scratched region is imaged to quantify cell migration rates. Typically, scratch assays are modelled by reaction diffusion equations depicting cell migration by Fickian diffusion and modelling proliferation by a logistic term. In a recent paper (Jin, W. et al. Bull Math Biol (2017)), the authors observed experimentally that during the early stage of the recolonisation process, there is a disturbance phase where proliferation is not logistic, and this is followed by a growth phase where proliferation appears to be logistic. The authors did not identify the precise mechanism that causes the disturbance phase but showed that ignoring it can lead to incorrect parameter estimates. The aim of this work is to show that a non-linear age-structured population model can account for the two phases of proliferation in scratch assays. The model consists of an age-structured cell cycle model of a cell population, coupled with an ordinary differential equation describing the resource concentration dynamics in the substrate. The model assumes a resource-dependent cell cycle threshold age, above which cells are able to proliferate. By studying the dynamics of the full system in terms of the subpopulations of cells that can proliferate and the ones that can not, we are able to find conditions under which the model captures the two-phase behaviour. Through numerical simulations we are able to show that the resource concentration in the substrate regulates the biphasic dynamics.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISJin '17Matsiaka '17Browning '20Simpson '18Jin '16Jin '18
84% semantic matchBiophysics
W. Jin, E. T. Shah, C. J. Penington+3 more·Bulletin of Mathematical Biology·Mar 23, 2017