High-Capacity transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HC-tDCS)
Kyle DonneryiD, Mohamad FallahRadiD, Niranjan KhadkaiD, Matthew SawiD, Benjamin BabaeviD, Santiago Osorio, Mojtaba Belali KoochesfahaniiD, Rayyan BhuiyaniD, Jana M. Elwassif, Marom BiksoniD
Abstract
BackgroundEnhancing tDCS technology can support the delivery of higher current intensities, enabling broader dose-response studies in human trials. MethodsHigh-Capacity tDCS (HC-tDCS) integrates novel electrodes and adaptive current/voltage controlled electronics. Multi-layer HC electrodes include polarity-specific redox layers and designed hydrogel interfaces, shaped for a bifrontotemporal montage. The stimulator design includes adaptive ramps with hybrid voltage-current control and low (7.5 V) compliance voltage. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were used to characterize electrode properties. Tolerability of HD-tDCS was tested for target currents 1-6 mA (in 1 mA increments) for 30 min on 5 healthy subjects, and compared with conventional tDCS using 2 mA F3-F4 sponge-electrodes. MRI-derived computational models predicted cortical electric fields. Tolerability was assessed according to the 100 mm visual analogue scale for pain (VASP-100), skin erythema assessment, thermal imaging, and adverse event questionnaires. ResultsThe electrode design including high-roughness polarity-specific capacity, electrochemically supports high-charge direct current stimulation. In all subjects, HC-tDCS was well tolerated at all tested doses (1-6 mA) with minor transient adverse events and average VASP-100 less than 15. VASP-100 during sponge-electrode tDCS at 2 mA was comparable to 5 and 6 mA HC-tDCS. HC-tDCS operates at significantly lower voltage than sponge-tDCS, impacting tolerability and efficiency. Modeling predicts peak frontal electric fields of 0.65-1.08 V/m for 2 mA HC-tDCS and 1.95-3.25 V/m for 6 mA HC-tDCS, compared to 0.49-0.95 V/m for 2 mA sponge-tDCS. ConclusionsHC-tDCS allows increased cortical stimulation; at 6 mA achieving double the 1 V/m electric field threshold in all subjects. Enabled by pre-stimulation procedures, specialized electrodes, and adaptive low-voltage stimulators, HC-tDCS is well tolerated at intensities up to at least 6 mA.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Optimizing transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) electrode position, size, and distance doubles the on-target cortical electric field: Evidence from 3000 Human Connectome Project models
Kevin A. Caulfield, Mark S. George·bioRxiv·Nov 21, 2021
- The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal and cortico-cortical excitability and response variability: conventional versus high definition montages
Michael Pellegrini, Maryam Zoghi, Shapour J. Jaberzadeh·Neuroscience ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jun 28, 2020
- Neural Mechanisms of tDCS: Insights from an In-Vivo Rodent Model with Realistic Electric Field Strengths
Liyi Chen, Alireza Majdi, … Myles Mc Laughlin·bioRxiv·Dec 20, 2024
- Bayesian statistics show a lack of change in excitability following bi-hemispheric HD-TDCS over the primary somatosensory cortices
Selene Gallo, Thijs J. Baaijen, … Valeria Gazzola·bioRxiv·Oct 22, 2019
- High-Frequency Stimulation Does Not Improve Comfort of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation
Ashley N Dalrymple, Charli Ann Hooper, … Douglas J. Weber·bioRxiv·Sep 6, 2022
- Transcranial direct current stimulation elevates the baseline activity while sharpening the spatial tuning of the human visual cortex
Jeongyeol Ahn, Juhyoung Ryu, … Sang‐Hun Lee·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2023