From exposure to infection: divergent fitness consequences of parasite encounters in a trophically-transmitted system
Chloe A. FouillouxiD, Jonathan S. Compton, Ipsita SrinivasiD, Marisa Schuldes, Audrey L Rollo, Ryan Paulman, Josh SampsoniD, Amanda K. HundiD, Jessica L. HiteiD
Abstract
Parasites can alter host populations in fundamentally different ways depending on whether exposure results in infection. Yet, most epidemiological and evolutionary inference focuses on established infections, leaving the fitness consequences of parasite exposure comparatively understudied. This gap is consequential because hosts are frequently exposed to diverse parasite genotypes, and these encounters can impose substantial fitness costs even when infection does not occur. Theory predicts that hosts may mitigate these costs when interacting with commonly encountered parasite genotypes, such that exposure to sympatric parasites incurs lower fitness consequences than exposure to novel, allopatric parasites. Here, we examine the fitness consequences of exposure and infection in the first intermediate host of the trophically transmitted tapeworm Schistocephalus solidus, a cyclopoid copepod that serves as the first host in a three-host life cycle. Using sympatric (Vancouver Island, Canada) and allopatric (Norway) host-parasite combinations, we found a striking reciprocal asymmetry. Sympatric parasites were significantly more infective, yet exposure to sympatric parasites imposed weaker fitness costs when infection did not establish. In contrast, allopatric parasites were less infective, but exposed females produced fewer eggs and had lower hatching success than both controls and females exposed to sympatric parasites, indicating substantial genotype-dependent costs of exposure. Moreover, we found that infection was highly virulent across all genotypes: a single parasite caused near-complete reproductive suppression and reduced host survival across all host-parasite pairings, confirming S. solidus as a castrating parasite in copepods. Together, these results demonstrate that exposure, not just infection, acts as a critical ecological filter with potentially large and underappreciated consequences for host population dynamics and parasite transmission.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Immune variation and host ontogeny constrain pathogen virulence and transmission in a helminth parasite
Chloe A. Fouilloux, Heather Alexander, … Jessica L. Hite·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2026
- Lack of Host Reproductive Trade-offs Associated with Fecundity Compensation Response to Parasitic Castration
A. A. Davis, J. T. Vannatta, … D. J. Minchella·bioRxiv·Jun 28, 2021
- Sick of Eating: eco-evo-immuno dynamics of predators and their trophically acquired parasites
S. R. Fleischer, D. I. Bolnick, S. Schreiber·EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Oct 12, 2021
- Differing effects of parasite-parasite interaction types on the spatial epidemiology of co-circulating parasites
Giacomo Zilio, Javier Zabalegui Bayona, … Andy Fenton·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2026
- The secretome of a parasite alters its host's behaviour but does not recapitulate the behavioural response to infection
C. S. Berger, N. Aubin-Horth·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2020
- Opening a can of worms: a test of the coinfection facilitation hypothesis
M. L. Rodgers, D. I. Bolnick·bioRxiv·May 18, 2023