bioRxivGeneticsPreprint
NMY-2, TOE-2 and PIG-1 Regulate C. elegans Asymmetric Cell Divisions
Joseph Robinson, Jérôme TeulièreiD, Shinja Yoo, Gian GarrigaiD
Abstract
Asymmetric cell division (ACD) is an important mechanism that generates cellular diversity during development. Not only do asymmetric cell divisions produce daughter cells of different fates, many can produce daughters of different sizes, which we refer to as Daughter Cell Size Asymmetry (DCSA). In C. elegans, apoptotic cells are frequently produced by asymmetric divisions that exhibit DCSA, where the smaller daughter dies. We focus here on the divisions of the Q.a and Q.p neuroblasts, which produce apoptotic cells and divide with opposite polarity using both distinct and overlapping mechanisms. The PIG-1/MELK and TOE-2 proteins both regulate DCSA and specify the apoptotic cell fate in both the Q.a and Q.p divisions. In many asymmetric cell divisions, the non-muscle myosin NMY-2 is involved in properly positioning the cleavage furrow to produce daughters of unequal size. It was previously reported that NMY-2 is asymmetrically distributed and required for the DCSA of Q.a but not Q.p. In this study, we examined endogenously tagged reporters of NMY-2, TOE-2, and PIG-1 and found that all were asymmetric at the cortex during both the Q.a and Q.p divisions. TOE-2 and NMY-2 were biased toward the side of the dividing cell that would produce the smaller daughter, whereas PIG-1 was biased toward the side that would produce the larger daughter. We used temperature-sensitive nmy-2 mutants to determine the role of nmy-2 in these divisions and found that these mutants only displayed DCSA defects in the Q.p division. We generated double mutant combinations between the nmy-2 mutations and mutations in toe-2 and pig-1. The nmy-2 mutations did not significantly alter the DCSA of the toe-2 and pig-1 mutants but did alter the fate of the Q.a and Q.p daughters. This finding suggests that NMY-2 functions together with TOE-2 and PIG-1 to regulate DCSA but plays an independent role in specifying the fate of the Q.a and Q.p descendants.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The Caenorhabditis elegans HAM-1 protein modifies G protein signaling and membrane extension to reverse the polarity of asymmetric cell division
Jérôme Teulière, Gian Garriga·bioRxiv·Dec 21, 2018
- Assessment of asymmetric cell divisions in the early development of Caenorhabditis elegans
Rolf Fickentscher, Matthias Weiß·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Aug 18, 2017
- Binary decision between asymmetric and symmetric cell division is defined by the balance of PAR proteins in C. elegans embryos
- Non-random segregation of mitochondria during asymmetric cell division contributes to cell fate divergence in daughter cells
Ioannis Segos, Jens Van Eeckhoven, … Barbara Conradt·bioRxiv·Sep 5, 2024
- The replicative helicase CMG is required for the divergence of cell fates during asymmetric cell division in vivo
Nadin Memar, Ryan Sherrard, … Barbara Conradt·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2024
- C. elegans Runx/CBFβ suppresses POP-1(TCF) to convert asymmetric to proliferative division of stem cell-like seam cells
Suzanne E. M. van der Horst, Janine Cravo, … Sander van den Heuvel·DevelopmentPeer-reviewed·Nov 15, 2019