bioRxivSystems BiologyPreprint
Multi-omic data fusion reveals the in vivo enzyme kinetics of Vibrio natriegens at the genome-scale
St. Elmo WilkeniD, Martin BeyßiD, Miroslav KratochvíliD, Alexa Grebel, Karen MethlingiD, Anja StefanskiiD, Paul London, Michael LalkiD, Klaus SchaperiD, Ilka Maria IM AxmanniD, Katharina NöhiD, Philipp WesthoffiD, Oliver EbenhöhiD
Abstract
Vibrio natriegens is a halophilic, Gram-negative marine bacterium that is increasingly used in metabolic engineering applications due to its fast growth rate. In sparse minimal medium the organism has a doubling time of 25 minutes, which is about twice as fast as Escherichia coli under similar conditions. Given that its protein density is similarly constrained to that of E. coli, this necessitates that its metabolic enzymes are able to catalyze flux at a higher rate to sustain its metabolism. In this work, we measure the apparent turnover numbers of metabolically active enzymes in V. natriegens under a variety of growth conditions. The apparent turnover numbers of V. natriegens enzymes were measured in vivo by conducting coupled quantitative proteomics and 13C metabolic flux analysis experiments under seven different carbon source conditions in sparse minimal medium. A high quality genome-scale metabolic model was constructed and curated using additional experimental data. This model was extended with enzyme constraints, and subsequently used to find kinetic parameters that minimize the difference between model predictions and experimental observations. This model guided data fusion approach enabled the estimation of 357 apparent turnover numbers for metabolically active enzymes in V. natriegens. Our results reveal that the metabolic enzymes of V. natriegens are in median 14-fold faster than those of E. coli under similar conditions. Moreover, we show that machine learning generated turnover number estimates substantially underestimate the kinetics of V. natriegens. Our turnover number estimates were used to parameterize multiple condition dependent enzyme constrained flux balance analysis models of V. natriegens, which improved their predictive accuracy compared to the machine learning parameterisation. The combined experimental-computational approach employed here sheds light on the mechanism V. natriegens uses to accelerate its growth. This approach can also be extended to other bacteria, increasing the availability of in vivo measured enzyme turnover numbers, and improving the predictive accuracy of enzyme constrained metabolic models of other microbes.
- organism: bacteria (other)
- assay: proteomics
- assay: metabolomics
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: statistical model
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- An analysis and optimization of growth condition requirements of the fast-growing bacterium Vibrio natriegens
C. Örencik, S. Mueller, … E. P. Amann·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2019
- Proteomics and constraint-based modelling reveal enzyme kinetic properties of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii on a genome scale
Marius Arend, David M. Zimmer, … Zoran Nikoloski·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Aug 8, 2023
- Vibrio natriegens is sensitive to its acidic fermentation products
Nicholas W. Haas, James B. McKinlay·Applied and Environmental MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 9, 2026
- Data integration across conditions improves turnover number estimates and metabolic predictions
Philipp Wendering, Marius Arend, … Zoran Nikoloski·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Mar 17, 2023
- Interrogating the effect of enzyme kinetics on metabolism using differentiable constraint-based models
S. E. Wilken, M. Besancon, … O. Ebenhoeh·bioRxiv·Jul 11, 2022
- Metabolic enzyme cost explains variable trade-offs between microbial growth rate and yield
Meike Tessa Wortel, Εlad Noor, … Wolfram Liebermeister·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 16, 2018