Benchmarking DIA data analysis workflows

Abstract

Data independent acquisition (DIA) has become a well-established method in LC-MS driven proteomics. Nonetheless, there are still a lot of possibilities at the data analysis level. By benchmarking different DIA analysis workflows using a ground-truth sample, consisting of a differential spike-in of UPS2 in a constant yeast background, we provide a roadmap for DIA data analysis of shotgun samples based on whether sensitivity, precision or accuracy is of the essence. Three different commonly used DIA software tools (DIA-NN, EncyclopeDIA and SpectronautTM) were tested in both spectral library mode and spectral library-free mode. In spectral library mode we used the independent spectral library prediction tools PROSIT and MS2PIP together with DeepLC, next to the classical DDA-based spectral libraries. In total we benchmarked 12 DIA workflows. DIA-NN in library-free mode or using in silico predicted libraries, together with Spectronaut in library-free mode, shows the highest sensitivity maintaining a high reproducibility and accuracy. In general, DIA-NN shows the best reproducibility, while the accuracy is comparable for all DIA workflows.