Spatial heterogeneity and microbial terroir: balancing dispersal limitation and cultivar as drivers of microbial diversity in viticulture
Abstract
The microbial communities inhabiting grapevines and wines exhibit spatiotemporal patterns linked to region, climate, and cultivar. However, the degree of spatial heterogeneity within and between vineyards and its relationship to cultivar-associated biodiversity selection has not been studied previously. We combined high-density sampling of grapevine microbiota (N = 230) with spatial modeling and satellite imagery in two experiments: (i) two monoclonal Chardonnay vineyards to examine spatial heterogeneity in a genetically homogenous population; and (ii) three old-vine vineyards interplanted with mixed cultivars to investigate the relative effects of spatial distance and cultivar on the microbiota. Contrary to expectations based on monoclonal vineyards, cultivar effects were not apparent in mixed-cultivar vineyards. Instead, we demonstrate extensive spatial variation in the bacterial and fungal communities inhabiting individual grapevines and vineyards, and that community similarity is correlated with spatial distance within and between vineyards. This suggests that dispersal limitation may play an important role in shaping grapevine microbiota, as well as cumulative diversity within the vineyard ecosystem (gamma diversity), with implications for both plant health and wine quality. Spatial models can identify abnormalities in microbial communities, such as contaminant sources within vineyards, and future studies examining microbiota in agricultural settings should account for spatial variation within the study design, e.g., by sufficiently dense spatial sampling or collection of grape musts to avoid undersampling bias. These findings add to the complicated story of microbial biogeography associated with winegrowing and wine quality (microbial terroir), highlighting the roles of dispersal and potential microclimate effects in agricultural settings.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Field percentile
- top 10%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A tale of two vineyards: parsing site-specific differences in bacterial and fungal communities of wine grapes from proximal vineyards, and their changes during processing in a single winery
Reid G. Griggs, Lena Flörl, … Nicholas A. Bokulich·Applied and Environmental MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·May 5, 2025
- Grape Expectations: Disentangling Environmental Drivers of Microbiome Establishment in Winegrowing Ecosystems
Lena Flörl, Patrik Schönenberger, … Nicholas A. Bokulich·npj Biofilms and MicrobiomesPeer-reviewed·Jan 16, 2026
- Grapevine bacterial communities across the Central Valley of California
J. F. Swift, Z. Migicovsky, … A. J. Miller·bioRxiv·Jul 1, 2023
- Temporal and spatial dynamics within the fungal microbiome of grape fermentation
Cristóbal A. Onetto, Christopher M. Ward, … Anthony R. Borneman·Environmental MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2024
- Diversity and dynamics of fungi during spontaneous fermentations and association with unique aroma profiles in wine
D. Liu, J.-L. Legras, … K. Howell·bioRxiv·Sep 10, 2020
- Microbial map of the world's vineyards:Applying the concept of microbial terroir on a global scale
A. Gobbi, A. Acedo, … L. H. Hansen·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2020