bioRxivGenomics
The shrinking human protein coding complement: are there fewer than 20,000 genes?
Iakes Ezkurdia, David JuaniD, Jose Manuel Rodriguez, Adam Frankish, Mark Deikhans, Jennifer L Harrow, Jesus Vazquez, Alfonso ValenciaiD, Michael Tress
Abstract
Determining the full complement of protein-coding genes is a key goal of genome annotation. The most powerful approach for confirming protein coding potential is the detection of cellular protein expression through peptide mass spectrometry experiments. Here we map the peptides detected in 7 large-scale proteomics studies to almost 60% of the protein coding genes in the GENCODE annotation the human genome. We find that conservation across vertebrate species and the age of the gene family are key indicators of whether a peptide will be detected in proteomics experiments. We find peptides for most highly conserved genes and for practically all genes that evolved before bilateria. At the same time there is almost no evidence of protein expression for genes that have appeared since primates, or for genes that do not have any protein-like features or cross-species conservation. We identify 19 non-protein-like features such as weak conservation, no protein features or ambiguous annotations in major databases that are indicators of low peptide detection rates. We use these features to describe a set of 2,001 genes that are potentially non-coding, and show that many of these genes behave more like non-coding genes than protein-coding genes. We detect peptides for just 3% of these genes. We suggest that many of these 2,001 genes do not code for proteins under normal circumstances and that they should not be included in the human protein coding gene catalogue. These potential non-coding genes will be revised as part of the ongoing human genome annotation effort.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A deep audit of the PeptideAtlas database uncovers evidence for unannotated coding genes and aberrant translation
Jose Manuel Rodríguez, Miguel Maquedano, … Michael L. Tress·bioRxiv·Nov 14, 2024
- More than 2,500 coding genes in the human reference gene set still have unsettled status
Miguel Maquedano, Daniel Cerdán-Vélez, Michael L. Tress·bioRxiv·Dec 5, 2024
- High-quality peptide evidence for annotating non-canonical open reading frames as human proteins
Eric W. Deutsch, Leron W. Kok, … Sebastiaan van Heesch·NaturePeer-reviewed·May 6, 2026
- Revealing missing isoforms encoded in the human genome by integrating genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic data
Zhiqiang Hu, Hamish S. Scott, … Chaochun Wei·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jul 9, 2015
- Nearly all new protein-coding predictions in the CHESS database are not protein-coding
Irwin Jungreis, Michael L. Tress, … Paul Flicek·bioRxiv·Jul 2, 2018
- A deep proteome and transcriptome abundance atlas of 29 healthy human tissues
Dongxue Wang, Basak Eraslan, … Bernhard Küster·Molecular Systems BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2019