Challenges of Dry Sanitization to Control Salmonella Dry Surface Biofilms
Vinícius S. A. VaziD, Jéssica de Aragão Freire Ferreira FingeriD, Raul Fernando PereiraiD, Erika Santiago da SilvaiD, Rafael Pimentel MaiaiD, Jean‐Yves MaillardiD, Maristela da Silva do NascimentoiD
Abstract
Salmonella is a pathogen linked to foodborne outbreaks, including low-moisture foods. Its ability to resist desiccation can contribute to the formation of dry surface biofilms (DSB). This study evaluated the impact of 3 DSB formation protocols (P1=48-h hydrated phase/48-h dry phase, P2=24-h/120-h and P3=8-h/48-h) on the resistance of Salmonella DSB to 70% alcohol, a commercial product (based on 0.015% quaternary ammonium and 25% isopropyl alcohol), gaseous ozone (45 ppm), hot air (90 {degrees}C) and UV-C light (254 nm). The type of DSB protocol impacted the efficacy of the sanitizers (p < 0.05). The biofilm with the shortest hydration phase showed the greatest susceptibility; three out of the five sanitizers evaluated (70% alcohol, commercial product, and UV-C) promoted significant reductions in P3, with counts below the detection limit (0.8 log CFU/cm{superscript 2}) after 5 to 15 min exposure. Regarding protocols P1 and P2, in general, the best performance was from UV-C, especially against DSB on polypropylene, where it achieved reductions of 1.3 log CFU/cm{superscript 2} for P1 and 2.9 log CFU/cm{superscript 2} for P2 after 15 to 30 min of exposure. In contrast, hot air and ozone showed less effectiveness, with reductions [≤]1.2 log CFU/cm{superscript 2}. In most scenarios, confocal microscopy images corroborated the plate count results (log CFU/cm{superscript 2}). In summary, our data indicates limited action of dry sanitizers on Salmonella DSB, requiring validation and optimization of sanitization processes to ensure the microbiological safety of low-moisture products.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- EFFECT OF DRY SANITIZATION ON DRY SURFACE BIOFILM OF Cronobacter sakazakii
Raul Fernando Pereira, Vinícius S. A. Vaz, … Maristela da Silva do Nascimento·bioRxiv·Aug 5, 2026
- Moisture Matters: Unintended Consequences of Performing Wet Sanitation in Dry Environments.
Calvin Slaughter, Shihyu Chuang, … Abigail B. Snyder·Applied and Environmental MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 24, 2026
- Variable fluid mechanics explain why static efficacy tests overestimate sanitizer performance against Listeria
Yang Jiao, Jakob Baker, … Abigail B. Snyder·Applied and Environmental MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 17, 2026
- Real-world testing of the durability claims of a commercially available spray-on surface biocide
Shilpa Saseendran Nair, Alana Cavadino, … Siouxsie Wiles·Applied and Environmental MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 15, 2025
- Reduction of Listeria on stainless steel surfaces is impacted by sanitizer application method
Yang Jiao, Jakob Baker, … Abigail B. Snyder·bioRxiv·Apr 9, 2025
- Antibacterial activity of solid surfaces is critically dependent on relative humidity, inoculum volume and organic soiling
H. Kaur, M. Rosenberg, … A. Ivask·bioRxiv·Mar 28, 2023