bioRxivCancer BiologyPreprint
Hierarchical classification of hematologic malignancies using epigenetic and genetic information
Maximilian SchönungiD, Melissa TüreiD, Panna LajeriD, Simon RendersiD, Tobias RauschiD, Til L. SteinickeiD, Anna DolnikiD, Eric SträngiD, Meghana S. OakiD, Jessica Heilmann, K RothiD, Lena Katzenstein, Christian RohdeiD, Etienne SollieriD, Peter HorakiD, Tim SaueriD, Jonathan C. StreffordiD, Martí Duran‐FerreriD, Christopher C. OakesiD, José Ignacio Martín-SuberoiD, Ulrich GermingiD, Michael Norbert DworzakiD, Albert Catala, Christian FlothoiD, Charlotte M. NiemeyeriD, , Daniel B. LipkaiD
Abstract
Molecular testing in hematology requires different assays for disease subgroup identification, risk stratification and selection of appropriate treatment regimens. Yet, molecular tests are not necessarily standardized between diagnostic laboratories, resulting in varying turnaround times and potentially divergent results. To resolve this issue and enable single-assay molecular testing, we have developed a hierarchical classification framework that combines epigenetic and genetic data from whole genome nanopore sequencing (WGNS) with machine learning to determine disease entities, epigenetic subgroups (epitypes) and genetic aberrations in hematopoietic neoplasms. We curated DNA methylation data from 5,420 samples and trained a classifier allowing entity-level diagnostics featuring 21 conditions, including healthy controls, acute and chronic myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms. This classifier was subsequently combined with entity-specific epitype classifiers predicting 44 therapeutically or prognostically relevant states, followed by integration of genetic data. Benchmarking of the combined (epi-)genetic testing strategy using WGNS confirmed high accuracy in the detection of diagnostic groups and risk stratification, and identified diagnosis-defining molecular alterations that were not reported by standard-of-care work-up.
- organism: human
- assay: DNA methylation
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Epigenenomic and transcriptomic characterization of NPM1-mutated CN-AML subtypes
Lia N’Guyen, Clara Tellez-Quijorna, … Estelle Duprez·bioRxiv·May 7, 2024
- Artificial Intelligence Applied to Epigenomic Data in Leukemia: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic, Prognostic and Monitoring Models
Jacopo Martelli·bioRxiv·Oct 9, 2026
- Chromatin landscape and epigenetic heterogeneity of acute myeloid leukemia
Yotaro Ochi, Markus Liew-Littorin, … Seishi Ogawa·bioRxiv·May 24, 2026
- Analytical validation and performance characteristics of a 48-gene next-generation sequencing panel for detecting potentially actionable genomic alterations in myeloid neoplasms
S. H. Rosenthal, A. Gerasimova, … F. Lacbawan·bioRxiv·Nov 30, 2020
- Network-based clustering unveils interconnected landscapes of genomic and clinical features across myeloid malignancies
F. Bayer, M. Roncador, … J. Kuipers·bioRxiv·Oct 25, 2023
- Improving the diagnosis and classification of Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms through deep phenotyping
K. Sirinukunwattana, A. Aberdeen, … D. Royston·bioRxiv·Sep 11, 2019